Back

How to Forage for a Mate?

Bernstein, D.; Hady, A. E.

2026-03-30 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.03.26.714598 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Foraging is a central decision-making behavior performed by all animals, essential to garnishing enough energy for an organism to survive. Similarly, mating is crucial for evolutionary continuity and offspring production. Mate choice is one of the central tenets of sexual selection, driving major evolutionary processes, and can be regarded as a decision-making process between potential mating partners. Often researchers have used coarse-grained models to describe macroscopic phenomenology pertaining to mate choice without detailed quantitative mechanisms of how animals use individual and environmental signals to guide their mating decisions. In this letter, we show that mate choice can be cast as a foraging problem, and we present an analytically tractable optimal foraging-inspired mechanistic theory of decision-making underlying mate choice. We begin from the premise that deciding upon which partner with which to mate is at its core a stochastic decision-making process. Agents adopt a variety of decision strategies, tuned by decision thresholds for leaving or committing to a mate. We find that sensitive leaving thresholds are favored independently of signal availability in the population. By contrast, optimal thresholds for committing to a mate depend upon signal availability in the population, with signal-rich populations generally favoring less eager strategies compared to signal-poor populations.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
23.1%
2
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.0%
4
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.5%
7
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
10
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
11
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.0%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.4%
13
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.3%
17
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
19
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
Theoretical Population Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
28
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.5%
29
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
30
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%