Back

Whole-genome pre-amplification as a viable approach for genomic screening of FFPE-derived DNA samples

Guerrero Quiles, C.; Lodhi, T.; Sellers, R.; Sahoo, S.; Weightman, J.; Breitwieser, W.; Sanchez Martinez, D.; Bartak, M.; Shamim, A.; Lyons, S.; Reeves, K.; Reed, R.; Hoskin, P.; West, C.; Forker, L.; Smith, T.; Bristow, R.; Wedge, D. C.; Choudhury, A.; Biolatti, L. V.

2026-03-29 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.03.26.714414 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) enables comprehensive analysis of tumour genomes, but its use in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples is limited by DNA fragmentation and low yields. Whole-genome amplification (WGA) methods such as multiple displacement amplification (MDA) can boost DNA availability but distort copy-number alteration (CNA) profiles. DNA ligation-mediated MDA (DLMDA) mitigates this bias by reconstituting fragmented templates, yet its performance in FFPE-derived DNA remains uncertain. We compared paired DLMDA pre-amplified (2h, 8h) and non-pre-amplified FFPE prostate tumour samples from 22 archival blocks (5, 15 and 20 years old). DLMDA increased DNA yield by 42- to 86-fold, with global CNA patterns largely preserved. However, DLMDA significantly reduced the number of detected CNA deletions and amplifications. These effects were independent of both block age and reaction time. CNA dropouts were randomly distributed across the genome, indicating that DLMDA does not introduce regional bias. Our results show that DLMDA enables robust DNA yield recovery and avoids false-positive CNA artefacts, but at the cost of reduced CNA sensitivity. While suitable for CNA screening pipelines through WGS, further improvements are required to minimise the false-negative risk and improve the techniques sensitivity for FFPE-based genomics.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.6%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.6%
3
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
4
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.5%
5
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
7
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
8
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
10
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
11
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
14
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.3%
16
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
17
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
24
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.7%
26
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
The Prostate
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
29
BioTechniques
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
30
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%