Back

Efficacy and Safety of Oral L-Ergothioneine Supplementation in Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Guo, C.; Liu, W.; Ding, W.; Cao, J.; Tong, T.; Liu, F.; Xiao, G.

2026-03-27 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2026.03.26.26349375 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral L-ergothioneine (EGT) in alleviating pain and associated symptoms in women with primary dysmenorrhea (PD). Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 40 women with PD (aged 18-30 years) were randomized (1:1) to receive EGT capsules (120 mg/day) or a matching placebo for 3 consecutive menstrual cycles. Outcomes evaluated at baseline and post-cycle included peak pain (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), Dysmenorrhea Symptom Score, and the COX Menstrual Symptom Scale (CMSS). Results: EGT significantly improved PD symptoms over 3 cycles. Mean VAS for peak pain decreased from 4.80 {+/-} 1.12 to 2.32 {+/-} 1.59 in the EGT group (p < 0.001), compared to a non-significant reduction (4.10 {+/-} 1.30 to 3.45 {+/-} 1.69) in the placebo group. The between-group difference at cycle 3 was significant (p < 0.01). A linear mixed-model confirmed a significant Time x Group interaction (p < 0.001), showing an accelerated decline in symptom severity for EGT. Furthermore, 84% of EGT-treated patients achieved [&ge;]50% VAS reduction versus 35% in the placebo group (p = 0.003). Serum inflammatory biomarkers showed no significant between-group differences or correlation with VAS improvements, suggesting EGT's analgesic effects likely operate via cytoprotective pathways independent of classical inflammatory cascades. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Oral EGT supplementation (120 mg/day) effectively and progressively mitigates menstrual pain and systemic symptoms in PD, offering a well-tolerated, non-pharmacological intervention. Trial Registration: ChiCTR2500112557; Retrospectively registered on 2025-11-17.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.8%
3
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
5
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
6
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
9
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
10
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
11
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
12
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
13
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
14
Cell Communication and Signaling
35 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
15
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
16
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
18
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
19
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
20
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
21
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
22
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
23
Reproduction
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
24
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
25
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%