Back

Determining context-specific economically feasible age ranges for female HPV catch-up vaccination in LMICs: a model-based health economic assessment

Wondimu, A.; Georges, D.; Macacu, A.; Wittenauer, R.; Fuady, A.; Gini, A.; Baussano, I.; Man, I.

2026-03-27 health economics
10.64898/2026.03.26.26348394 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Catch-up vaccination will be pivotal for achieving WHOs cervical cancer elimination goals in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We assessed the health-economic impact of catch-up HPV vaccination for females in LMICs. Methods Using IARCs METHIS modelling platform and data from 132 LMICs, we simulated HPV catch-up vaccination beyond the primary target age, varying the maximum age up to 30 years. Budget impact was expressed as a share of national five-year immunization budgets and current health expenditure. We conducted cost-effectiveness analyses for a smaller subset of countries for which high-quality cervical cancer treatment costs were available. Findings Catch-up HPV vaccination up to age 30 in LMICs could prevent 9.2 million cervical cancer cases over the lifetime among females aged 9-30 years. Across countries, budget impact ranged from 0.007%-2.24% of five-year health expenditure and 0.002%-236.65% of immunization budgets, with vaccine procurement comprising about 70% of costs. Gavi support could reduce costs by nearly 70% for catch-up up to age 18. Catch-up vaccination up to age 30 was cost-effective in almost all evaluated countries, except in one where cost-effectiveness was achieved up to age 21. Interpretation In LMICs, after achieving adequate coverage in the primary target group (9-14 years), expanding HPV catch-up vaccination would be impactful and cost-effective. Sustainable financing, Gavi support, and cost-minimization strategies are crucial for successful catch-up programmes and progress toward cervical cancer elimination.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.3%
2
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.0%
3
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.3%
4
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.1%
5
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
6
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
7
Journal of Medical Economics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
10
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
11
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
12
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
npj Vaccines
62 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
16
Vaccine: X
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
18
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
19
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
20
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
21
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
23
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
24
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
25
Medical Decision Making
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
27
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
28
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
30
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%