Back

Snap Back to Reality: The Comparison of Spatial Memory in the Lab and the Real World

Huffman, D. J.; Annes, P. J.; Gowda, C.; Colina, L.

2026-03-28 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.03.25.714295 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spatial navigation could theoretically serve as an early neurobehavioral marker of Alzheimers disease risk, yet technological limitations have hindered its widespread adoption. We leveraged breakthroughs in technology to create a custom smartphone application to compare real-world spatial memory with lab-based measures. Specifically, we compared performance across two established lab-based tasks, judgments of relative direction (JRD) and map drawing, and our novel app-based, in situ pointing task administered in a familiar large-scale, real-world environment. Young adults completed both laboratory and mobile navigation tasks, allowing within-subject comparisons across modalities. JRD performance strongly correlated with map drawing performance. In contrast, App-based pointing showed lower error and reduced inter-individual variability relative to JRD performance, but weak correlations with lab-based measures. We also developed a novel analytical technique in which we transformed the app-based pointing into a relational, JRD-like metric, and we observed strong correlations and correlated patterns of errors across all tasks. Thus, real-world, app-based pointing captures stable directional performance (e.g., as indexed by the lower errors and lower variability relative to the JRD Task) and, when expressed in a common framework, correlates with laboratory measures of spatial memory, thus suggesting that these tasks tap into partially overlapping cognitive representations. These results provide a pivotal advancement to our understanding of both shared and unique variance across spatial memory paradigms, and support the use and further development of mobile navigation tools as scalable complements to lab-based assessments for studying spatial cognition and its decline in preclinical and clinical stages of Alzheimers disease. HighlightsO_LISpatial memory is a core cognitive function and is impaired in Alzheimers disease C_LIO_LITesting memory in large-scale, real-world environments enhances ecological validity C_LIO_LIWe compared performance of our novel real-world measure with lab measures C_LIO_LIWe observed strong correlations between the lab-based measures C_LIO_LIWe observed shared and unique variance between lab- and real-world measures C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
26.0%
2
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
4
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
5
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.2%
7
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
8
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
2.9%
10
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
11
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
13
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.2%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.2%
16
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
17
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
20
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Behavior Research Methods
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
24
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Hippocampus
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
29
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%