Back

Tailoring physical activity recommendations to reduce cardiovascular mortality: interactions with age, sex and body morphology

Schwendinger, F.; Infanger, D.; Rowlands, A.; Schmidt-Trucksäss, A.

2026-03-27 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.03.25.26349341 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: This prospective cohort analysis investigated how age, sex, and body morphology modify associations of physical activity (PA) intensity, duration, and volume with cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. Methods: We analysed wrist-worn accelerometer data from 8,661 adults (51.9% women) in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The outcome was CVD mortality. PA intensity and volume were quantified using the intensity gradient and average acceleration, respectively. Survey-weighted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate associations, including interaction terms with age, sex, or body morphology (waist-to-height ratio as indicator of adiposity). Results: Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 81 (69, 94) months. All hazard ratios (HR) compare 50th with 25th percentile. Beneficial associations between CVD mortality and PA were stronger in younger than older adults for intensity (e.g., 45-year-olds: HR=0.47, 95%CI:0.29-0.75 vs 75-year-olds: HR=0.75, 95%CI:0.54-1.06), and volume (e.g., HR=0.18, 95%CI:0.07-0.71 vs 0.29, 95%CI:0.16-0.51). In women, intensity-related association were stronger than in men (HR=0.45, 95%CI:0.31-0.65 vs HR=0.79, 95%CI:0.50-1.24). Volume-related associations were stronger in men (HR=0.37, 95%CI:0.22-0.60 vs HR=0.24, 95%CI:0.11-0.51), though with earlier plateauing and greater uncertainty. Associations were observed across waist-to-height ratio levels but attenuated at higher values (intensity: waist-to-height ratio 0.5, HR=0.45, 95%CI:0.29-0.69 vs 0.6, HR=0.69, 95%CI:0.49-0.97; volume: 0.5, HR=0.07, 95%CI:0.03-0.17 vs 0.6, HR=0.28, 95%CI:0.17-0.45). Conclusion: Older adults and men may benefit more from increasing PA volume than intensity, whereas younger adults and women may benefit more from higher-intensity PA. Although benefits were observed across adiposity levels, associations were attenuated as adiposity increased, suggesting stronger benefits in individuals with low-to-moderate adiposity.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.9%
2
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.6%
4
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
5
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
8
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
9
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
10
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
12
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
14
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
15
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
17
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
21
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.5%
26
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
27
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%