Back

Social, economic, and environmental disparities in device-measured 24-hour movement behaviours in a nationally representative cohort of older English adults

Brocklebank, L.; Steptoe, A.; Bloomberg, M.; Doherty, A.

2026-03-27 public and global health
10.64898/2026.03.25.26349270 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Background: Insufficient physical activity, excessive sedentary time, and suboptimal sleep are linked to premature mortality and chronic disease and may contribute to social inequalities in health, but most evidence is self-reported. Device-measured, nationally representative data capturing the full 24-hour movement spectrum remain scarce, particularly among older adults. This study examined social, economic, and environmental disparities in 24-hour movement behaviours in the 2021-23 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) accelerometry sub-study. Methods: A subset of 5,382 ELSA participants (71.9%) was invited to wear an Axivity AX3 wrist accelerometer for eight days, with 4,354 (80.9%) agreeing. Raw data were processed using machine learning to derive step count, sleep duration, moderate-to-vigorous and light physical activity, sedentary time, and time in bed. Cross-sectional associations with sex, age, education, marital status, wealth, and urbanicity were examined using linear regression. Findings: Data from 3,648 participants (mean age 68.5 {+/-} 9.3 years; 44.3% men) were included in wear time analyses (median 6.6 days, IQR 6.0-6.9), with 3,161 (86.7%) having sufficient wear time for movement behaviour analyses. Older, unmarried, or lower education/wealth participants were less active, more sedentary, and slept less. Rural participants were more active than urban participants. Women accumulated fewer steps and less moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and sedentary time, but more light activity and longer sleep than men. Interpretation: Social, economic, and environmental disparities exist across the full 24-hour movement spectrum, highlighting population groups for targeted interventions. Follow-up data will clarify how 24-hour movement behaviours influence healthy ageing and contribute to social inequalities in health.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
14.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
4
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 26%
3.6%
6
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Experimental Gerontology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
16
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
19
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
21
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
24
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
29
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
30
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%