Back

Social, economic, and environmental disparities in device-measured 24-hour movement behaviours in a nationally representative cohort of older English adults

Brocklebank, L.; Steptoe, A.; Bloomberg, M.; Doherty, A.

2026-03-27 public and global health
10.64898/2026.03.25.26349270 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Background: Insufficient physical activity, excessive sedentary time, and suboptimal sleep are linked to premature mortality and chronic disease and may contribute to social inequalities in health, but most evidence is self-reported. Device-measured, nationally representative data capturing the full 24-hour movement spectrum remain scarce, particularly among older adults. This study examined social, economic, and environmental disparities in 24-hour movement behaviours in the 2021-23 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) accelerometry sub-study. Methods: A subset of 5,382 ELSA participants (71.9%) was invited to wear an Axivity AX3 wrist accelerometer for eight days, with 4,354 (80.9%) agreeing. Raw data were processed using machine learning to derive step count, sleep duration, moderate-to-vigorous and light physical activity, sedentary time, and time in bed. Cross-sectional associations with sex, age, education, marital status, wealth, and urbanicity were examined using linear regression. Findings: Data from 3,648 participants (mean age 68.5 {+/-} 9.3 years; 44.3% men) were included in wear time analyses (median 6.6 days, IQR 6.0-6.9), with 3,161 (86.7%) having sufficient wear time for movement behaviour analyses. Older, unmarried, or lower education/wealth participants were less active, more sedentary, and slept less. Rural participants were more active than urban participants. Women accumulated fewer steps and less moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and sedentary time, but more light activity and longer sleep than men. Interpretation: Social, economic, and environmental disparities exist across the full 24-hour movement spectrum, highlighting population groups for targeted interventions. Follow-up data will clarify how 24-hour movement behaviours influence healthy ageing and contribute to social inequalities in health.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.