Back

Heterogeneity in referral preferences of women at high risk for postpartum depression: a discrete choice experiment

Jin, X.; Zhang, L. L.; Li, H.; Gong, W.

2026-03-31 primary care research
10.64898/2026.03.25.26349110 medRxiv
Show abstract

Despite the global prevalence of postpartum depression (PPD), current referral uptake rates are far from satisfactory. While some qualitative studies have investigated factors affecting PPD referrals, a gap in quantitative analysis remains. Addressing this, our study utilized a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to understand the procedural elements influencing PPD referral uptake among diagnosed women. The DCE was conducted via home visits by healthcare providers and a comprehensive mobile app questionnaire. We constructed seven distinct referral attributes to explore participants' preferences, analyzed using mixed logit models and latent class analysis. This analysis identified key determinants and revealed the heterogeneities in referral preferences. A total of 698 individuals completed the DCE questionnaire. All assessed attributes, except for Accompaniment (going to clinic with a family member), were important determinants of preference. Participants generally preferred referrals to psychiatric clinics, face-to-face consultations, lower costs, and shorter waiting times. Significantly, participants' personal and socio-demographic characteristics also played a critical role in their referral preferences. Latent class analysis categorized participants into four distinct groups based on their preferences, with treatment cost and waiting times being the most decisive factors. In conclusion, the preference for PPD referrals is predominantly driven by convenience and access to specialist care. To enhance referral uptake, developing flexible and personalized referral programs that cater to these preferences is crucial.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.0%
2
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.6%
3
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.5%
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
6
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
9
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.9%
11
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
12
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
14
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
16
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
20
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.0%
22
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
24
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
27
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
30
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%