Back

Proteomic Signatures of Conversion Risk and Disease Severity in Multiple Sclerosis

Bisteau, X.; Bastide, L.; Imbault, V.; Perrotta, G.; Borrelli, S.; Elands, S.; van Pesch, V.; Borras, E.; Sabido, E.; Gaspard, N.; Communi, D.

2026-03-30 neurology
10.64898/2026.03.25.26348613 medRxiv
Show abstract

Despite important advances in understanding the etiopathology of multiple sclerosis, factors determining disease progression remain partially understood and often difficult to predict. Specific diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers are needed to optimize the risk-benefit ratio of treatment for each patient. The aim of our study was to identify a cerebrospinal fluid proteomic signature associated with diagnosis and short- to mid-term prognosis across the multiple sclerosis continuum. Our multicentric cohort study analyzed CSF samples from 120 patients using a proteomics data-independent acquisition strategy. Differentially expressed proteins were identified across diagnostic groups: 62 patients with multiple sclerosis, 15 patients with clinically isolated syndrome, and 43 healthy controls. We also compared the CSF of patients with no evidence of disease activity with those with disease activity at 2 and 5 years of follow-up. A diagnostic and prognostic classification model was built using iterative cross-validated logistic regression models on shared differentially expressed proteins across these two comparisons. A total of 1,257 proteins were quantified, and 162 differentially expressed proteins were identified across comparisons. We identified a set of ten proteins associated with the diagnosis and prognosis of multiple sclerosis, including previously identified potential biomarkers (CH3L2, IGHG1, IGKC, LAMP2, ADA2), proteins known to be involved in the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis (A0A8J8YUT9, AT2A2, CO3A1) and two yet unreported proteins (DSC2 and MMRN2). Multivariate models based on these proteins achieved good accuracy for the diagnosis of MS compared with CIS (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUROC] up to 80% using 3 proteins) and prognosis (NEDA vs. EDA; AUROC up to 96% at 2 and 5 years; using 5 proteins). These results, which will require further investigation to validate the new biomarkers, open new perspectives on multiple sclerosis pathophysiology and therapeutic targets.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.4%
2
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
3
Annals of Neurology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
4
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
6
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
7
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.9%
8
Acta Neuropathologica
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
9
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
11
Neurobiology of Disease
148 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
12
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
14
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.3%
15
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
16
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
17
Journal of Neurochemistry
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
Clinical and Experimental Immunology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.5%
20
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
21
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
22
Journal of Advanced Research
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
23
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
89 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
24
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
25
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
26
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
27
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.0%
28
Molecular Neurobiology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.8%
30
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%