Back

Proteomic Signatures of Conversion Risk and Disease Severity in Multiple Sclerosis

Bisteau, X.; Bastide, L.; Imbault, V.; Perrotta, G.; Borrelli, S.; Elands, S.; van Pesch, V.; Borras, E.; Sabido, E.; Gaspard, N.; Communi, D.

2026-03-30 neurology
10.64898/2026.03.25.26348613 medRxiv
Show abstract

Despite important advances in understanding the etiopathology of multiple sclerosis, factors determining disease progression remain partially understood and often difficult to predict. Specific diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers are needed to optimize the risk-benefit ratio of treatment for each patient. The aim of our study was to identify a cerebrospinal fluid proteomic signature associated with diagnosis and short- to mid-term prognosis across the multiple sclerosis continuum. Our multicentric cohort study analyzed CSF samples from 120 patients using a proteomics data-independent acquisition strategy. Differentially expressed proteins were identified across diagnostic groups: 62 patients with multiple sclerosis, 15 patients with clinically isolated syndrome, and 43 healthy controls. We also compared the CSF of patients with no evidence of disease activity with those with disease activity at 2 and 5 years of follow-up. A diagnostic and prognostic classification model was built using iterative cross-validated logistic regression models on shared differentially expressed proteins across these two comparisons. A total of 1,257 proteins were quantified, and 162 differentially expressed proteins were identified across comparisons. We identified a set of ten proteins associated with the diagnosis and prognosis of multiple sclerosis, including previously identified potential biomarkers (CH3L2, IGHG1, IGKC, LAMP2, ADA2), proteins known to be involved in the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis (A0A8J8YUT9, AT2A2, CO3A1) and two yet unreported proteins (DSC2 and MMRN2). Multivariate models based on these proteins achieved good accuracy for the diagnosis of MS compared with CIS (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUROC] up to 80% using 3 proteins) and prognosis (NEDA vs. EDA; AUROC up to 96% at 2 and 5 years; using 5 proteins). These results, which will require further investigation to validate the new biomarkers, open new perspectives on multiple sclerosis pathophysiology and therapeutic targets.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
2
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.4%
3
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.4%
4
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
6
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
7
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.6%
8
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
11
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
12
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
13
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
14
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
15
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
17
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
18
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
19
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
Acta Neuropathologica
51 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
21
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
22
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
24
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Journal of Neuroinflammation
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
29
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
30
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%