Back

Paralytic Shellfish Toxin production in Alexandrium minutum (Dinophyceae): insights from omics integration using toxigenic and non-toxigenic recombinant progeny

Mary, L.; Quere, J.; Latimier, M.; Artigaud, S.; Hegaret, H.; Le Gac, M.; Reveillon, D.

2026-03-26 genomics
10.64898/2026.03.24.713948 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Paralytic Shellfish Toxins (PSTs) are produced by certain species of cyanobacteria and dinoflagellates. Part of the PST biosynthetic pathway has been elucidated in cyanobacteria, and the implication of some sxt genes has been confirmed by experimental studies. Contrary to cyanobacteria, knowledge about PST biosynthesis in dinoflagellates is more limited and generally restricted to comparative studies with the cyanobacterial pathway. To investigate the specificity of the PST pathway in dinoflagellates, 16 toxic and non-toxic A. minutum strains from a recombinant cross were compared, without prior assumption on genes or metabolites involved in PST synthesis, using an integrative approach combining untargeted metabolomic and transcriptomic data. Among the 60 most distinguishing transcripts between toxic and non-toxic strains, only 3 sxt genes were present, sxtA4, sxtG, and sxtI. In contrast, non-sxt homologs were detected as highly discriminant between these two phenotypes. More specifically, a phyH homolog may act as the analog of sxtS found in cyanobacteria. Moreover, we identified four putative synthetic PST intermediates. Among these, Int-C2, correlated with the toxic phenotype, whereas 3 others were detected in both toxic and non-toxic strains, suggesting that these strains may share some parts of the biosynthetic pathway. Finally, our results showed that PST biosynthesis in dinoflagellate results from the activity of sxt genes, acquired by horizontal gene transfer from cyanobacteria, as well as from other genes not acquired from cyanobacteria, such as phyH.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.2%
2
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.0%
3
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
4
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.5%
6
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.5%
7
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 26%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
10
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.6%
14
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
17
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Algal Research
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.9%
21
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
30
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%