A Demographic Look at Cancer Treatment Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Acosta Morales, J. M.
Show abstract
Abstract/SummaryO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSWhile numerous studies have explored the relationship between COVID-19 and cancer, few have specifically examined the significant impact of the pandemic on cancer patients, particularly concerning their treatments and appointments. ObjectivesThis study aims to investigate cancer treatment behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodsThis retrospective quantitative study utilized data from the Centers for Disease Control and Preventions National Health Interview Survey of 2020. The inclusion criteria were as follows: studies conducted within the United States; patients diagnosed with COVID-19 since the pandemic began; patients diagnosed with cancer within the United States; patients undergoing cancer treatment or in remission since the start of the pandemic; patients who experienced a change, delay, or cancellation of treatment due to the COVID-19 pandemic; patients who experienced a change or delay in cancer care due to the COVID-19 pandemic; patients with a weakened immune system due to prescriptions; and patients who took prescription medication within the past 12 months. The variables were analyzed against population characteristics, including age, race, gender, cancer type, and COVID-19 status. Python Jupyter Notebook (packaged by Anaconda Navigator in R Studio, version 6.4.8), Microsoft Excel for data cleaning and assessment, and SPSS were used for statistical analyses. ResultsChi-Square Analysis (p<.05) revealed significant associations between cancer treatment and gender (p=0.009), other cancer treatments and age (p<.001) and education (p<.001), changes in other cancer treatments and gender (p=0.045), race (p<.001), age (p<.001), and education (p=.013), and prescribed medication and gender (p=.009), family income (p<.001), and age (p<.001). ConclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted cancer care in the U.S., affecting the delivery of treatments. Additional government funding is necessary to help medical facilities develop programs for off-site treatment delivery, to better prepare for future pandemics, and avoid repeating past challenges.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Projected Cancer Burden, Challenges, and Barriers to Cancer Prevention and Control Activities in the State of Telangana 96%
- Experiences of cervical cancer survivors in Chitwan, Nepal: a qualitative study 95%
- Long COVID and its associated factors among COVID survivors in the community from a middle-income country – an online cross-sectional study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Socioeconomic and comorbid factors affecting mortality and length of stay in COVID-19 94%
- The Impact of Fasting the Holy Month of Ramadan on Colorectal Cancer Patients and Two Tumor Biomarkers: A Tertiary-Care Hospital Experience 94%
- Age Based Trends for Unplanned Pediatric Rehospitalizations in the United States 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient Centered Perspectives on Suicidal Ideation: A Mixed Methods Investigation in Gastrointestinal Cancer Care 94%
- Immunotherapy and Cannabis: A Harmful Drug Interaction or Reefer Madness? 91%
- Loss of CHGA protein as a potential biomarker for colon cancer diagnosis: a study on biomarker discovery by machine learning and confirmation by immunohistochemistry in colorectal cancer tissue microarrays 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical, Behavioral and Social Factors Associated with Racial Disparities in Hospitalized and Ambulatory COVID-19 Patients from an Integrated Health Care System in Georgia 94%
- Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study 93%
- Family physicians supporting patients with palliative care needs within the Patient Medical Home in the community: An Appreciative Inquiry qualitative study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.