Back

A Demographic Look at Cancer Treatment Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Acosta Morales, J. M.

2026-03-26 oncology
10.64898/2026.03.24.26349229 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract/SummaryO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSWhile numerous studies have explored the relationship between COVID-19 and cancer, few have specifically examined the significant impact of the pandemic on cancer patients, particularly concerning their treatments and appointments. ObjectivesThis study aims to investigate cancer treatment behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodsThis retrospective quantitative study utilized data from the Centers for Disease Control and Preventions National Health Interview Survey of 2020. The inclusion criteria were as follows: studies conducted within the United States; patients diagnosed with COVID-19 since the pandemic began; patients diagnosed with cancer within the United States; patients undergoing cancer treatment or in remission since the start of the pandemic; patients who experienced a change, delay, or cancellation of treatment due to the COVID-19 pandemic; patients who experienced a change or delay in cancer care due to the COVID-19 pandemic; patients with a weakened immune system due to prescriptions; and patients who took prescription medication within the past 12 months. The variables were analyzed against population characteristics, including age, race, gender, cancer type, and COVID-19 status. Python Jupyter Notebook (packaged by Anaconda Navigator in R Studio, version 6.4.8), Microsoft Excel for data cleaning and assessment, and SPSS were used for statistical analyses. ResultsChi-Square Analysis (p<.05) revealed significant associations between cancer treatment and gender (p=0.009), other cancer treatments and age (p<.001) and education (p<.001), changes in other cancer treatments and gender (p=0.045), race (p<.001), age (p<.001), and education (p=.013), and prescribed medication and gender (p=.009), family income (p<.001), and age (p<.001). ConclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted cancer care in the U.S., affecting the delivery of treatments. Additional government funding is necessary to help medical facilities develop programs for off-site treatment delivery, to better prepare for future pandemics, and avoid repeating past challenges.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
33.9%
2
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.0%
3
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.6%
4
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
7
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
9
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
10
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
11
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
13
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
16
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
17
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
22
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
27
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Database
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%