Back

AI-Derived ECG Age Gap as a Digital Biomarker for Cardiovascular Risk Stratification

Huang, S.; Nie, G.; Xie, D.; Li, J.; Tang, G.; Zhang, D.; Xu, Q.; Hong, S.

2026-03-26 health informatics
10.64898/2026.03.24.26349186 medRxiv
Show abstract

Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of global mortality, and early risk stratification is critical for improving prognosis. Artificial intelligence-derived electrocardiography (AI-ECG) provides a promising approach to derive cardiac biological age as a non-invasive digital biomarker. This study developed an AI-ECG framework based on the ECGFounder foundation model to quantify cardiac biological aging and predict cardiovascular risk. A total of 67,824 ECGs from 63,512 UK Biobank participants were included. The model was trained on the development cohort (n = 26,871), comprising healthy individuals, and evaluated in an independent clinical evaluation cohort (n = 40,953). The AI-ECG Age Gap was assessed for its association with MACCE and other secondary outcomes using Cox models. The model demonstrated good agreement between predicted and chronological age in the development cohort (r = 0.646; MAE = 4.61 years). In the clinical cohort, after adjusting for clinical comorbidities, each 1-year increase in the age gap was associated with a significant 13 percent higher risk of (HR = 1.13, 95 percent CI: 1.11-1.14) Individuals with an overestimated age gap (> 6 years) exhibited substantially elevated risks of MACCE (HR = 4.51) and other major cardiovascular outcomes, whereas those with an underestimated age gap (< -6 years) showed a significantly lower risk of MACCE (HR = 0.46) alongside protective effects across other outcomes. The AI-ECG age gap effectively quantifies occult accelerated cardiac aging. As a non-invasive digital biomarker, it exhibits immense potential for cardiovascular risk stratification in broad populations.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.2%
2
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.5%
3
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.9%
4
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
5
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.4%
7
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
8
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
9
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
10
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
13
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
16
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
18
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
19
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
21
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
22
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
24
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
26
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
27
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
28
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
29
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%