Back

Enhanced expression of HLA-DR and CD69 on peripheral CD4+ T cells predicts better clinical outcomes in cutaneous melanoma

Tomas, A.; Maximino, J.; Nunes, H.; Salvador, R.; Luis, R.; Brito, C.; Saraiva, D. P.; Gouveia, E.; Pereira, C.; Goncalves, F.; Farricha, V.; Carvalho, E. L.; Moura, C.; Passos, M. J.; Cristovao-Ferreira, S.; Pereira, P. M.; Cabral, M. d. G.; Pojo, M.

2026-03-26 oncology
10.64898/2026.03.24.26349163 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCutaneous melanoma (CM) is an aggressive skin cancer with rising incidence, representing a growing public health concern. Despite the remarkable success of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the management of advanced disease, mortality remains high due to therapy resistance. Identifying reliable prognostic and predictive biomarkers is therefore essential to improve patient stratification, optimize treatment selection, and minimize unnecessary toxicity. MethodsWe comprehensively profiled the circulating immune landscape of 54 treatment-naive CM patients by integrating flow cytometry immunophenotyping with clinicopathological data, and performed tumor gene expression analysis in a subset of 26 patients. ResultsElevated HLA-DR and CD69 expression on circulating CD4+ T cells, together with reduced circulating CD8+ T cell frequency, emerged as candidate prognostic biomarkers associated with improved survival. Prognostic models combining these immune variables with clinical covariates accurately stratified patients by overall survival (89.5% sensitivity, 72.7% specificity; AUC = 0.872, p < 0.0001) and progression/recurrence risk (75% sensitivity and 71.4% specificity; AUC = 0.763, p = 0.001). In a subset of 43 patients subsequently treated with ICIs, elevated baseline HLA-DR and CD69 expression on circulating CD4+ T cells was also associated with therapeutic benefit. A predictive model integrating these markers with clinical covariates achieved good discriminatory performance (65.2% sensitivity, 88.9% specificity; AUC = 0.775, p = 0.0027). Tumor gene expression profiling supported the role of IFN-{gamma}-related signatures, previously linked to ICI response, as complementary prognostic and predictive tools. ConclusionThese findings highlight systemic CD4+ T cell activation status as a promising, easily measurable biomarker in CM, laying the foundation for future strategies to refine patient stratification and guiding immunotherapy decisions.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
2
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.8%
3
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
4
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
5
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
7
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
10
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
11
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
12
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
13
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
15
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
17
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
19
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
20
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
21
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
22
Clinical & Translational Immunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
24
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
25
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
26
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
27
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
28
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
30
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%