Back

Age-related differences in spatial memory occur alongside reduced visual fMRI BOLD but preserved viewpoint-specific scene representations

Srokova, S.; Barnes, C. A.; Ekstrom, A.

2026-03-25 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.23.713765 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Current evidence suggests that older adults perform worse at tasks involving spatial memory and navigation, yet the underlying reasons remain unclear. Here, we tested the hypothesis that age-related declines in spatial memory stem from difficulties in recognizing spatial environments from rotated perspectives. Young and older adults underwent fMRI as they encoded virtual scenes which were later viewed either from the same or rotated perspective. Older adults were worse at identifying changes in these scenes, although the age effect was equally robust across perspective conditions. Neural specificity of scene representations was examined with the phenomenon of fMRI repetition adaptation. We predicted that young adults would show significant fMRI adaptation to the same but not rotated perspective, indicative of intact viewpoint specificity, while older adults show would adaptation effects to both. While analyses of raw fMRI BOLD produced results consistent with these predictions, follow-up analyses revealed a general attenuation of activity in older adults across both perspective conditions. Additionally, although older adults showed both lower fMRI BOLD and worse spatial memory, lower trial-wise BOLD was associated with better performance independent of age. This suggests that the variance associated with fMRI adaptation is reflective of two independent sources of variance: age and cognition. Our results suggest that age differences in spatial memory may manifest due to cognitive and neural factors that are shared across same and rotated perspectives, and thus they cannot be explained by a selective deficit in allocentric (viewpoint-independent) processing. Significance StatementIncreasing age is often associated with reduced spatial memory and navigation. Prior research suggests that age differences in spatial memory could be exacerbated by changes in perspective, possibly due to increased difficulties in the ability to construct allocentric (viewpoint-independent) representations from previously encoded egocentric perspectives. Here, we demonstrate that older adults are equally disadvantaged when recognizing layouts across same and rotated perspectives. FMRI analyses indicate that older age is associated with reduced fMRI BOLD in higher-level visual cortex across both perspective conditions, as opposed to altered specificity of perspective coding. Consequently, the present study challenges the notion that aging is associated with a selective decline in allocentric spatial memory and instead supports a more general age-related difficulty with scene processing.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.4%
3
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.2%
4
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.8%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.3%
6
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.8%
8
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
9
Hippocampus
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.6%
11
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.7%
13
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
14
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
16
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
18
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
21
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
22
Communications Psychology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
23
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%