Higher SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Burden Among Racialized Individuals: Evidence from Canadian Serology Data
Mann, S. K.; Wilson, N. J.; Lee, C. E.; Fisman, D.
Show abstract
Introduction: COVID-19 transmission has not been evenly distributed across racial groups, with exposure being shaped by social and structural factors. The emergence of highly transmissible variants (i.e., Omicron) dramatically increased infection rates. However, it remains unclear whether racial disparities in transmission disappeared or persisted over the course of the pandemic. Objective: To understand how SARS-CoV-2 transmission differed by race in Canada and whether those disparities changed with the Omicron variant. Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence data from the Canadian Blood Services serosurveillance program (June 2020 to April 2023) using a previously described dynamic susceptible-infection model, while accounting for seroreversion. Race-specific force of infection was estimated for the pre-Omicron and Omicron periods (with the emergence of Omicron defined as beginning December 26, 2021). Results: Prior to Omicron, racialized individuals had a 74% higher force of infection (IRR = 2.205; 95% CI: 2.115-2.299). During the Omicron period, infection rates rose significantly within each racial group relative to the pre-Omicron period, with a 55.52-fold increase among White individuals and a 31.27-fold increase among racialized individuals. Despite this, racialized individuals remained disproportionately affected following the emergence of Omicron, with 24% higher infection rates than those of their White counterparts (IRR = 1.242; 95% CI: 1.231-1.253). Conclusion: Widespread transmission during Omicron did not result in epidemiologic equity, as racialized populations continued to experience higher infection risk despite crude seroprevalence depicting convergence.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Epidemiology of the early COVID-19 epidemic in Orange County, California: comparison of predictors of test positivity, mortality, and seropositivity 92%
- Racial/ethnic disparities in exposure to COVID-19, susceptibility to COVID-19 and access to health care – findings from a U.S. national cohort 92%
- Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in Juba, South Sudan: a population-based study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adjusting COVID-19 seroprevalence survey results to account for test sensitivity and specificity 94%
- Missing data and missed infections: Investigating racial and ethnic disparities in SARS-CoV-2 testing and infection rates in Holyoke, Massachusetts 93%
- Social inequalities in COVID-19 deaths by area-level income: patterns over time and the mediating role of vaccination in a population of 11.2 million people in Ontario, Canada 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of Accumulated SARS-CoV-2 Seroconversion in North Carolina: The COVID-19 Community Research Partnership 93%
- The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies in Australian children: a cross sectional study 93%
- Does a humoral correlate of protection exist for SARS-CoV-2? A systematic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Geographical concentration of COVID-19 cases by social determinants of health in 16 large metropolitan areas in Canada – a cross-sectional study 93%
- Progressive Increase in Virulence of Novel SARS-CoV-2 Variants in Ontario, Canada 92%
- The mobility gap: estimating mobility levels required to control Canada’s winter COVID-19 surge 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections among adults in Georgia, USA, August-December 2020 94%
- Protection conferred by Delta and BA.1/BA.2 infection against BA.4/BA.5 infection and hospitalization: A Retrospective Cohort Study 91%
- SARS-CoV-2 Serosurveys: How antigen, isotype and threshold choices affect the outcome 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.