Back

Longitudinal Analysis of Superoxide Dismutase 1 Seeding Activity in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Cerebrospinal Fluid

Sebogo, M. A.; Frans, M. C.; Paulose, H.; Rodriguez, C. L.; Hsiung, G.-Y.; Cashman, N. R.; Ly, C. V.; Leavens, M.

2026-03-25 neurology
10.64898/2026.03.20.26348753 medRxiv
Show abstract

Twenty percent of familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (fALS) cases are linked to mutations in the Superoxide Dismutase 1 (SOD1) gene and accumulation of misfolded SOD1 aggregates. SOD1 misfolding from the broader ALS population without SOD1 mutations is less clear. Here, we report SOD1 seeding activity in antemortem cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from ALS participants with and without SOD1 mutations during ALS progression. Antemortem CSF from controls, SOD1-ALS, and sporadic ALS (sALS) patients was subjected to SOD1 seed amplification real-time quaking induced conversion (RT-QuIC) assays. SOD1-ALS CSF exhibited shorter lag phase and increased ThioflavinT (ThT) fluorescence amplitude compared to healthy controls and those with spinal muscular atrophy. CSF from sALS participants, who had no mutations in SOD1 or nine other ALS risk genes, also displayed SOD1 seeding activity, indicating wild-type SOD1 is aggregate-prone in the broader ALS population. Longitudinal CSF data indicated that SOD1 seeding activity correlates with ALS progression via the ALS Functional Rating Scale Revised (ALSFRS-R) slope decline and CSF neurofilament light. Our sALS CSF cohort primarily comprised of participants less than 2 years from symptom onset, suggesting that SOD1 seeding activity is an early biomarker that may enable inclusion in clinical trials. With the FDA-approval of tofersen (Qalsody), a SOD1-lowering antisense oligonucleotide, new SOD1 diagnostic, prognostic and pharmacodynamic biomarkers may enable SOD1-targeting strategies that could benefit the broader ALS population.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.