Back

A pilot genome-wide association study of ischemic heart disease with co-occurring arterial hypertension in a Kazakh cohort

Skvortsova, L.; Yergali, K.; Zhaxylykova, A.; Begmanova, M.; Mansharipova, A.

2026-03-23 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.03.19.26348868 medRxiv
Show abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of ischemic heart disease (IHD) remain underrepresented in Central Asian populations. We conducted a pilot GWAS of IHD with co-occurring arterial hypertension in a Kazakh cohort to identify candidate loci for future replication. A case-control GWAS was performed in 451 individuals (236 cases and 215 controls). Genotyping was conducted using the Illumina Infinium Global Screening Array-24 v3.0. Association testing was performed using a logistic regression under an additive genetic model adjusted for age, sex and the first ten principal components (PC1 - PC10). Multiple testing correction was applied using the Bonferroni adjustment. As an additional analysis, knowledge-guided GWAS (KGWAS) followed by MAGMA gene-based testing was used to prioritize candidate genes. After quality control, 345 371 variants were tested. Two loci surpassed the Bonferroni-corrected genome-wide significance threshold: rs28898595 at the UGT1A locus (effect allele C; OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.23 - 0.49; p = 3.01x10-8) and rs28709059 in the intron region of the ACTR3C gene (effect allele C; OR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.29 - 0.55; p = 4.08x10-8). Several additional loci showed suggestive evidence of association. In gene-level analysis, the CSMD1 gene demonstrated a significant association signal in MAGMA consistent with the European (p = 1.16x10-11) and East Asian (p = 9.07x10-11) LD reference panels. This pilot study identifies genome-wide significant loci (UGT1A, ACTR3C genes) and supports CSMD1 gene as a prioritized candidate gene for the complex phenotype of IHD associated with co-occurring arterial hypertension in the Kazakh cohort. These findings are preliminary and require replication in larger Central Asian cohorts and further functional validation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.