Back

A pilot genome-wide association study of ischemic heart disease with co-occurring arterial hypertension in a Kazakh cohort

Skvortsova, L.; Yergali, K.; Zhaxylykova, A.; Begmanova, M.; Mansharipova, A.

2026-03-23 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.03.19.26348868 medRxiv
Show abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of ischemic heart disease (IHD) remain underrepresented in Central Asian populations. We conducted a pilot GWAS of IHD with co-occurring arterial hypertension in a Kazakh cohort to identify candidate loci for future replication. A case-control GWAS was performed in 451 individuals (236 cases and 215 controls). Genotyping was conducted using the Illumina Infinium Global Screening Array-24 v3.0. Association testing was performed using a logistic regression under an additive genetic model adjusted for age, sex and the first ten principal components (PC1 - PC10). Multiple testing correction was applied using the Bonferroni adjustment. As an additional analysis, knowledge-guided GWAS (KGWAS) followed by MAGMA gene-based testing was used to prioritize candidate genes. After quality control, 345 371 variants were tested. Two loci surpassed the Bonferroni-corrected genome-wide significance threshold: rs28898595 at the UGT1A locus (effect allele C; OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.23 - 0.49; p = 3.01x10-8) and rs28709059 in the intron region of the ACTR3C gene (effect allele C; OR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.29 - 0.55; p = 4.08x10-8). Several additional loci showed suggestive evidence of association. In gene-level analysis, the CSMD1 gene demonstrated a significant association signal in MAGMA consistent with the European (p = 1.16x10-11) and East Asian (p = 9.07x10-11) LD reference panels. This pilot study identifies genome-wide significant loci (UGT1A, ACTR3C genes) and supports CSMD1 gene as a prioritized candidate gene for the complex phenotype of IHD associated with co-occurring arterial hypertension in the Kazakh cohort. These findings are preliminary and require replication in larger Central Asian cohorts and further functional validation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.7%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.7%
3
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.6%
4
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
8
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
11
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
15
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
18
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
19
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.7%
29
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
30
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%