Back

Development and Validation of a Multimodal AI-Based Model for Predicting Post-Prostatectomy Treatment Outcomes from Baseline Biparametric Prostate MRI

Simon, B. D.; Akcicek, E.; Harmon, S. A.; Clifton, L. D.; Thakur, A.; Gurram, S.; Clifton, D.; Wood, B. J.; Karaosmanoglu, A. D.; Choyke, P. L.; Akata, D.; Pinto, P. A.; Turkbey, B.

2026-03-22 urology
10.64898/2026.03.19.26348716 medRxiv
Show abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer and cause of cancer death in American men. Existing risk prediction methods have limited accuracy and reproducibility, resulting in difficulty in predicting disease severity. We demonstrate the development and external validation of an automated multimodal artificial intelligence algorithm using biparametric MRI (bpMRI) and clinical covariates for predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in PCa patients. Development cohort included 80% of patients from center 1 (n = 240) who underwent prostate MRI prior to RP between January 2008 and December 2018 with a minimum of two years of follow-up after RP. Test cohort included the remaining 20% of center 1 patients (n = 71), and the external validation cohort from center 2 (n = 168). Center 2 patients included those who underwent prostate MRI and RP between January 2015 and December 2024 with a minimum of two years of follow-up. Clinical comparisons were CAPRA-S (center 1) and ISUP grade group from post-RP biopsy (center 2). Models developed were a clinical model (M0), an automated clinical model (M1), a radiomics model (M2), and a multimodal model (M3). Clinical variables (M0) included PSA, age, primary Gleason, and ISUP grade group. Automated clinical variables (M1 and M3) included PSA and age. Radiomics features (M2 and M3) were extracted from bpMRI using a lesion detection algorithm. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were calculated, and log-rank tests compared BCR-free survival to assess the models ability to discriminate relative to clinical standards. Intermediate-risk groups were also assessed. The multimodal model (M3) had the highest AUC across test sets (combined: 0.71; center 1: 0.70; center 2: 0.75) and was the only model to significantly differentiate BCR-free survival outcomes in intermediate-risk groups across both centers (p < 0.05). This automated multimodal model leveraging radiomics and clinical covariates can predict BCR after RP, approaches clinical gold standards, and may enhance imaging-based prognostication following further validation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.6%
3
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.8%
4
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.5%
6
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
8
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
9
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.8%
11
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
13
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
17
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
22
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
26
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
29
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%