Back

A unified modeling platform for informing cervical cancer prevention policy decisions in 132 low- and middle-income countries

Man, I.; Macacu, A.; Eynard, M.; Adhikari, I.; Gini, A.; Georges, D.; Baussano, I.

2026-03-20 public and global health
10.64898/2026.03.18.26348700 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Public health decision modelling tools designed to inform cervical cancer prevention policies in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are useful but scarce. Important challenges herein are the often missing or inconsistently collected cervical cancer epidemiological data, and the lack of a systematic approach to deal with such data limitations. Methodology/Principal Findings: We developed a unified modelling platform and workflow to enable cervical cancer modelling in 132 LMICs based on the previously developed footprinting approach, through the following steps: 1) With sexual behavior data from the Demographic Health Surveys (DHS), which were available for a large number of LMICs (70/132), we identified clusters of countries which represent distinct patterns of human papillomavirus (HPV) transmission. The 7 resulting clusters correspond to a gradient of HPV prevalence and cervical cancer risk and exhibit clear geographical separation. 2) The remaining LMICs were classified into the identified clusters based on geographical proximity so that each LMIC was grouped to a cluster. Goodness of classification was validated using available epidemiological data. 3) We then calibrated the HPV transmission and cervical cancer progression models of the IARC/WHO METHIS platform to the 132 LMICS, first by cluster then by country, using the available data on sexual behavior (from DHS), HPV prevalence (from literature search), and cervical cancer incidence (from GLOBOCAN). Conclusions/Significance: A unified workflow and platform designed by IARC/WHO for public health decision modelling of cervical cancer prevention in 132 LMICs is now available. It is ready to be used to support global and local stakeholders to coordinate, design, and implement impactful and efficient prevention policies and will help to accelerate cervical cancer elimination.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.0%
2
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
3
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.1%
4
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.8%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.8%
7
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
8
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
10
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
11
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
16
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
29
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%