Back

DNA Damage Driven Viability Loss and Transcriptional Reprogramming in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cell Perfusion Culture

Hitchcock, N. B.; Annoh, M.; Grassi, L.; Das, S.; Sayago Ferreira, C.; Ray, D.; Elgendy, R.; Wang, L.; Lee, K.; Sudbery, I. M.; Bose, D. A.; Hatton, D.; Sou, S. N.; Mistry, R.; Toseland, C. P.

2026-03-18 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.03.16.712126 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Intensified perfusion cultures promise higher yields and consistent product quality, yet extended runs frequently stall due to declining Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell viability at high cell density. Here, we identify DNA damage accumulation as a central, previously underappreciated driver of this limitation. Using two antibody-expressing CHO cell lines operated at a control and high cell density in perfusion bioreactors, we combined time-resolved transcriptomics with molecular, biophysical and super-resolution imaging analyses. We observed a progressive, global downregulation of DNA damage response (DDR) pathways accompanied by a time-dependent accumulation of DNA lesions. Notably, {gamma}H2AX signalling declined despite DNA damage, indicating impaired damage sensing and repair. Concomitantly, RNA polymerase II protein levels and transcriptional hub organisation were markedly reduced, consistent with widespread transcriptional dysfunction preceding loss of viability. An extended 21-day perfusion run confirmed continued viability decline beyond day 14, supporting a cumulative damage model. Comparison with HEK293 cells revealed substantially more efficient DNA repair, underscoring an intrinsically attenuated DDR in CHO cells. Together, these findings demonstrate that unrepaired DNA damage fundamentally constrains perfusion culture longevity, exposing limits of CHO genomic plasticity and highlighting DDR pathways as promising targets for host cell engineering to enhance perfusion performance.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.