Back

Development and validation of a deep learning model for the automated detection of vertebral artery calcification on non-contrast head-and-neck computed tomography

Ueda, Y.; Okazaki, T.; Isome, H.; Patel, A.; Ichimasa, T.; Asaumi, R.; Kawai, T.; Suyama, K.; Hayashi, S.

2026-03-17 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.03.15.26348421 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundVertebral artery calcification (VAC), a critical indicator of cerebrovascular disease, is often overlooked in head-and-neck imaging. Manual detection is time-consuming and prone to inter-observer variability. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning model for automated detection and quantitative risk assessment of VAC in non-contrast head-and-neck computed tomography (CT) images, bridging the diagnostic gap between dentistry and vascular medicine. MethodsWe developed a deep learning model based on the ResNet-18 architecture, designated as Grayscale ResNet, optimized for single-channel CT images. The development followed a two-phase strategy: initial training on 539 axial images from head-and-neck CT image followed by iterative refinement (fine-tuning) using a targeted dataset of clinically significant cases to ensure generalizability. The models performance was evaluated using patient-level Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis and saliency map visualization for clinical interpretability. ResultsThe optimized model demonstrated a robust performance in distinguishing between cases with and without VAC. In the independent cohort, the model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.846. At a specific threshold value (98.6%), the system yielded a sensitivity of 80.0% and a specificity of 90.6%. A saliency map analysis confirmed that the model consistently focused on anatomically relevant vascular regions. ConclusionsThe proposed automated system provides an accurate and reliable method for VAC screening using routine head-and-neck CT scans. By transforming incidental imaging findings into a quantifiable risk index, this tool can serve as a vital decision-support system for dentists and radiologists, facilitating early patient referrals and contributing to global stroke prevention.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.5%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.3%
5
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
8
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
9
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
12
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
14
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
15
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
18
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
19
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
21
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
26
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
29
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%