Back

AI for Fisheries Science: Neural Network Tools for Forecasting, Spatial Standardization, and Policy Optimization

Kapur, M.; Adams, G.; Lapeyrolerie, M.; Thorson, J. T.

2026-03-17 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.13.711664 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents novel opportunities for tackling complex marine resource management challenges. Among AI models, neural networks are a powerful class of tools capable of learning nonlocal and lagged patterns from fisheries data as well as approximating nonlinear relationships among multiple latent variables using estimation methods that automatically implement statistical shrinkage. This gives them potential to effectively handle data obtained from fisheries populations subject to dynamic environments. We highlight two flexible subclasses and one application of neural networks: Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Convolutional Neural networks (CNNs) and policy discovery via Reinforcement Learning. LSTMs are designed to handle sequential data by allowing prediction from past values at both short and long time-lags. CNNs are not explicitly designed to handle temporal information, but can interpolate a spatial latent variable based on its value within a geographic neighborhood, and can be combined with LSTM models for this purpose. This "Food for Thought" paper introduces and applies these neural network approaches, both alone and in combination, to demonstrate their potential application for several foundational topics in fisheries science: 1) the forecasting of population weight-at-age, 2) the standardization of spatio-temporal indices of relative abundance, and 3) the discovery of harvest policies to optimize catches and maintain spawning biomass. Each section provides a simple, simulated example and describes the tradeoffs - particularly the lack of inferential capability - presented by using neural networks over traditional approaches for each topic. We then outline medium-term research questions that may clarify, facilitate or qualify the applicability of these tools to fisheries management science. Finally, we discuss how future combinations of these approaches could result in simplified ways to estimate and forecast stock biomass and provide harvest advice.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.9%
2
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.6%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
7
Movement Ecology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
9
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
11
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
13
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
14
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
16
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.0%
18
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.5%
26
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
27
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
28
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%