A pragmatic, decentralized trial of the home-based InTandem neurorehabilitation system: analyses of engagement, safety, and effectiveness from the OrcHESTRAS trial
Awad, L. N.; Taylor, S. R.; Pohlig, R. T.; Maricich, Y. A.; Finklestein, S. P.; Riley, E. H.; Carlowicz, C. A.; Harris, B. A.; Bethoux, F. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundChronic stroke-related gait impairment remains a major source of disability. InTandem is an autonomous neurorehabilitation system delivering individualized, progressive rhythmic auditory stimulation for home-based gait rehabilitation. ObjectivesTo evaluate: (1) engagement during a 12-week autonomous, home-based intervention, (2) changes in walking endurance and functional mobility, and (3) outcome differences across pre-defined engagement and baseline speed subgroups. MethodsThis pragmatic, decentralized trial enrolled adults [≥]6 months post-stroke with residual gait deficits. Participants were asked to complete 30-minute sessions 3x/week for up to 12 weeks. Engagement was primarily assessed as the proportion achieving moderate-to-high weekly usage (> 4 weeks; benchmark p1 = 0.60). Changes in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) distances and Timed Up and Go (TUG) times were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. ResultsOf the 204 who initiated the intervention, 81.9% (95% CI [0.76-0.87]) engaged at least 4 weeks, meeting the primary endpoint (p < 0.001). Overall, 58.1% achieved high engagement (> 9 weeks), 23.9% moderate engagement (4-8 weeks), and 18.1% low engagement ([≤]3 weeks). Significant improvements in 6MWT distance (+ 26.1 {+/-}5.6 m; 95% CI [14.99, 37.22]) and TUG times (-1.45{+/-}0.31 s; 95% CI [-2.06, -0.84]) (p < 0.001) were observed. Engagement influenced effectiveness: each additional week engaged predicted a 5.82 m greater gain in the 6MWT (SE = 2.05; 95% CI [1.77, 9.87], p < 0.005). ConclusionsAutonomous home-based delivery of music-based rhythmic auditory stimulation achieved moderate-to-high engagement and improved walking endurance and functional mobility, supporting InTandem as a scalable approach to chronic stroke gait rehabilitation. Trial registrationTrial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT06051539. Registered on 20 September 2023. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06051539
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-site identification and generalization of clusters of walking impairment in individuals with chronic stroke and neurotypical controls 95%
- Comparing a novel neuroanimation experience to conventional therapy for high-dose, intensive upper-limb training in subacute stroke: The SMARTS2 randomized trial 95%
- Predictors of arm non-use in chronic stroke: a preliminary investigation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trial of high-intensity gait training and step monitoring for stroke 97%
- Continuous theta-burst stimulation of the contralesional primary motor cortex for promotion of upper limb recovery after stroke: a randomized controlled trial 95%
- When two communication differences intersect: Comparing inpatient rehabilitation care and outcomes for people with post-stroke aphasia who do and do not require an interpreter 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying Exercise Intensity to Predict Changes in Walking Capacity in People with Chronic Stroke 96%
- Disparities in Access to, Use of, and Quality of Rehabilitation Care Following Stroke: A Scoping Review 93%
- Using remotely delivered Spring Forest Qigong™ to reduce neuropathic pain in adults with spinal cord injury: A non-randomized controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The whole day matters after stroke: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of a 'sit less, move more, sleep better program early after stroke 94%
- Supervised and self-directed technology-based dual-task exercise training programme for older adults at risk of falling – Protocol for a feasibility study 94%
- Connecting real-world digital mobility assessment to clinical outcomes for regulatory and clinical endorsement – the Mobilise-D study protocol 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.