Back

Timing the regional spread of PRRSV-2 variants across the United States

Herrera da Silva, J. P.; Paploski, I.; Kikutu, M.; Pamornchainavakul, N.; Corzo, C.; VanderWaal, K.

2026-03-13 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.12.711334 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus 2 (PRRSV-2) represents a major threat to the global swine industry. The epidemiological dynamics of PRRSV-2 are characterized by the recurrent annual emergence of dozens of variants. Long-distance spread of PRRSV-2 is largely driven by animal shipments. Spatiotemporal dynamics of PRRSV-2 in the USA have been explored; however, how fast variants spread to new regions after their emergence remains unclear, and this information could improve preparedness. To address this, we analyzed 14,835 sequences, retrieved from the Morrison Swine Health Monitoring Project (MSHMP), representing 156 variants sampled from 2015 to 2024, covering the five major swine-producing regions in the USA: the Upper Midwest (UM), Lower Midwest (LM), Atlantic Seaboard (AS), Northeast (NE), and Great Plains (GP). Time to spread was assessed using the time-to-dispersal event analysis and waiting time analyses. Genetic diversity was measured using Hill numbers. The UM had the highest variant richness (n=123), followed by the LM (n=47), AS (n=35), NE (n=45), and GP (n=38). Of the 62 variants that initially emerged in the UM, 17 later spread to other regions. The UM also received the highest number of variant introductions (n=24), followed by LM (n=14), NE (n=14), AS (n=4), and GP (n=7), highlighting regional differences in connectivity and risk. Our results suggest faster dispersal corridors among interior regions (e.g., GP to UM and LM to UM, [~]1.2-2.0 years) and slower for coast to interior pathways (AS to interior, [~]2-3 years). These findings may help anticipate the risk of PRRSV-2 variant introduction and provide more accurate dispersal time estimates, which are useful for improving epidemiological models and disease preparedness.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.0%
2
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
3
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
7
Archives of Virology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
8
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
9
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
10
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
11
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
12
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
13
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.1%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
17
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
18
Frontiers in Virology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.7%
23
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%