Back

Long-term adherence, safety and effectiveness of nusinersen in spinal muscular atrophy patients: a population-based study

Aragon-Gawinska, K.; Nungo Garzon, N. C.; Muelas, N.; Sivera, R.; Sevilla, T.; Hervas, D.; Pitarch, I.; Vazquez Costa, J. F.

2026-03-12 neurology
10.64898/2026.03.11.26348135 medRxiv
Show abstract

Nusinersen was the first disease modifying treatment approved for 5q spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Long-term results of broad populations, particularly for adolescents and adults, remain limited. We conducted a population-based, ambispective observational study of all SMA patients living in the Valencian Community (Spain) between September 2017 and December 2022 and follow-up until December 2025. Demographic, clinical and motor outcomes using revised SMA Functional Composite Score (SMA-FCR) were collected. Patients were classified as responders or non-responders. The risk for nusinersen discontinuation was assessed with a Bayesian model, and SMA-FCR trajectories with mixed linear regression. Of 72 patients included, 18 were <12 years old (all treated with nusinersen) and 54 were [&ge;]12 years (28 treated; 26 untreated) at the baseline visit. After a median of 7 years, all patients <12 years were classified as responders versus 68% of patients [&ge;]12 years. Discontinuation rates were 11% in children compared to75% in the older cohort. In patients [&ge;]12 years, reasons for discontinuation included: treatment burden (71%), and loss(53%) or lack of benefit (43 %). Lower baseline SMA-FCR (expEstimate= 0.84 [0.718,0.93], prob:1) and older age (expEstimate=1.028 [1.011,1.055], prob:1) independently predicted higher discontinuation risk. Sustained nusinersen treatment was independently associated with SMA-FCR increase, while untreated and discontinued patients showed slight deterioration over time. In this long-term population-based study, nusinersen use and persistence was high in children but declined significantly after age 12 due to treatment burden and limited efficacy. However, a proportion of adolescents and adults (those younger and with higher baseline function) experienced sustained benefit.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
2
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
3
Movement Disorders
62 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
4
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
6
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
7
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
9
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
10
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
12
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
15
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
16
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
18
Neurology Genetics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
24
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Clinical and Translational Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
npj Parkinson's Disease
89 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
28
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%
30
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%