Back

FLT-PET as predictive non-invasive biomarker for neoadjuvant therapy with Wee1 and ATR inhibitors

Bukhari, A. B.; Wuest, M.; Wuest, F.; Gamper, A. M.

2026-03-13 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.03.10.710900 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Besides immunotherapy, inhibitors of the DNA damage response (DDR) are currently one of the most promising contributors to improved cancer therapy. They exploit elevated replicative stress in cancer cells and often rely on synthetic lethality with existing gene deficiencies or between targeted pathways. In view of the absence of reliable histological biomarkers for replicative stress, this study examined [18F]-fluorothymidine (FLT) positron emission tomography (PET) as alternative or complementary approach to predict treatment response to DDR inhibitors. Using orthotopic and syngeneic triple negative breast cancer mouse models and treatment with combined AZD6738 and AZD1775 (inhibiting ATR and Wee1, respectively) this study found that: a) Sequential [18F]FLT-PET in the early phase of treatment was able to predict ATR/Wee1 inhibitor treatment efficacy, whereas b) [18F]FLT tumor uptake at onset of therapy was unable to predict treatment outcome, despite c) [18F]FLT tumor uptake positively correlating with Ki-67 staining, the clinically used proliferation marker. Importantly, non-invasive monitoring of changes in tumor biology by [18F]FLT-PET predicted which tumor model responds to combined AZD6738/AZD1775 treatment and established a quantitative correlation in [18F]FLT tumor uptake with tumor shrinkage in individual responders. Since the inhibitors AZD6738 and AZD1775 are already in phase I/II clinical trials, this knowledge could soon be translated into the clinic. To our knowledge this is the first study to correlate non-invasive PET imaging with treatment efficacy of DDR inhibitors. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=100 SRC="FIGDIR/small/710900v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (31K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e18b7eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8d306corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1663a21org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7261c2_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.5%
2
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
5
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
6
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
8
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
12
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Neoplasia
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
16
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
21
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
22
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
23
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
24
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
26
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
29
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%