Evaluation of SOFA-2 Score Performance Across Demographic Subgroups: An External Validation Study Using MIMIC-IV
Ellen, J. G.; Hao, S.; Gao, C. A.; Arias, M. D. P.; Viola, M.; Wong, A.-K. I.; Mattie, H.; Parker, W.; Haidau, C.; Matos, J.; Chaves, R. C. d. F.; Celi, L. A.
Show abstract
The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)-2 score was recently validated for ICU mortality prediction across more than 3 million admissions but was not evaluated across demographic subgroups. We assessed the discrimination and calibration of the SOFA-2 score for ICU mortality across subgroups defined by age, sex, race and ethnicity, primary language, and insurance status. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients (aged 18 years or older) admitted to ICUs at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center between 2008 and 2022 (MIMIC-IV, version 3.1), selecting the first ICU admission per patient. First-day SOFA-2 scores (range, 0-24) were calculated using worst recorded values across 6 organ systems. Discrimination was assessed using AUROC, calibration using intercepts and slopes, and subgroup differences using bootstrap resampling. Among 64,015 ICU admissions (median age, 66 years [IQR, 54-78]; 56.1% male; 66.1% White), overall ICU mortality was 7.2% (n=4,596). Overall AUROC was acceptable at 0.77 (95% CI, 0.76-0.77). Notably, discrimination declined significantly with age: AUROC was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.83-0.87) for ages 18-44 and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.70-0.73) for ages 75 and older (difference in AUROC, -0.14; 95% CI, -0.16 to -0.11), with systematic underprediction of mortality in older patients (calibration intercept, 0.39). Discrimination was also significantly lower among non-English speakers (difference in AUROC, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.01) but did not differ significantly across documented racial and ethnic groups. Patients with unknown race/ethnicity (14.3% of the cohort) had nearly double the overall mortality rate and poor calibration. SOFA-2 demonstrated good overall performance for ICU mortality prediction but with clinically meaningful variation across demographic subgroups, particularly a substantial decline in discrimination with advancing age. These findings underscore the need for routine equity evaluation of clinical prediction tools before widespread implementation.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- ABCDEF Bundle Implementation: The influence of access to bundle-enhancing supplies and equipment 94%
- A Transcriptomic Severity Metric that Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Surgical Sepsis Patients 93%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of Blood Purification with Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Preliminary Report 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- SOFA score performs worse than age for predicting mortality in patients with COVID-19 95%
- Development and validation of a predictive model for critical illness in adult patients requiring hospitalization for COVID-19 95%
- Identifying predictors and determining mortality rates of septic cardiomyopathy and sepsis-related cardiogenic shock: A retrospective, observational study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- ICU and ventilator mortality among critically ill adults with COVID-19 94%
- Accuracy of a Risk Alert Threshold for ICU Hypoglycemia: Retrospective Analysis of Alert Performance and Association with Clinical Deterioration Events 92%
- An international factorial vignette-based survey of intubation decisions in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Associations with Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in COVID-19 Patients upon Admission: A Model for Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in 329 Unvaccinated, Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients 93%
- The COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium observational study: Design and rationale of a prospective, international, multicenter, observational study 93%
- Use of the first National Early Warning Score recorded within 24 hours of admission to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality in unplanned COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for severe COVID-19 differ by age: a retrospective study of hospitalized adults 93%
- Imputation of PaO2 from SpO2 values from the MIMIC-III Critical Care Database Using Machine-Learning Based Algorithms 93%
- Identifying organ dysfunction trajectory-based subphenotypes in critically ill patients with COVID-19 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.