Back

Integrating AI-powered automated neurovascular bundle segmentation and radiomics for prostate cancer staging

Urbanos, G.; Nogue-Infante, A.; Ribas, G.; Higa, F.; Mena-Clavelis, M.; Rudenko, P.; Baettig, E.; Belloch-Ripolles, V.; Fuster-Matanzo, A.; Marti-Bonmati, L.; Alberich-Bayarri, A.; Jimenez-Pastor, A.

2026-03-11 oncology
10.64898/2026.03.10.26347880 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAssessment of the prostatic neurovascular bundles on MRI is clinically relevant for staging and treatment planning but remains technically challenging and underexplored in automated imaging pipelines. PurposeTo develop and evaluate an automated framework for neurovascular bundle segmentation, proximity-based invasion risk stratification, and radiomics-based prediction of biochemical recurrence, perineural invasion, and extraprostatic extension. MethodsThis retrospective study included 808 prostate MRI examinations from three datasets acquired between 2015 and 2020. Among them, 470 T2-weighted image sequences were manually annotated to train a 3D full-resolution nnU-Net segmentation model. Tumor-to-neurovascular bundle distance was used to define invasion risk categories (low, intermediate, high). Machine learning models were developed using radiomics features extracted from neurovascular bundles, lesions, and combined regions, with optional inclusion of prostate-specific antigen and age at MRI. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and accuracy. Model interpretability was assessed using Shapley additive explanations. ResultsThe median patient age was 69 years (interquartile range, 63-73). Automatic neurovascular bundles segmentation achieved anatomically plausible contours, with average surface distance below 1 mm and volume difference under 0.4 cc. The resulting tumor-to-neurovascular bundle invasion risk classification reached 90% accuracy, supporting usability. Radiomics models showed predictive value across endpoints, with moderate testing performance for biochemical recurrence (AUC = 0.73), and higher discrimination for perineural invasion (AUC = 0.80) and extraprostatic extension (AUC = 0.80). Interpretability analysis revealed that tumor-to-neurovascular bundle proximity and neurovascular bundles imaging features among the most relevant contributors to outcome prediction. ConclusionsAutomated neurovascular bundle segmentation enabled quantitative tumor proximity assessment and radiomics-based prediction of biochemical recurrence, perineural invasion, and extraprostatic extension.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.5%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
4
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
5
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.9%
6
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.6%
8
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
10
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.1%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
14
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
16
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
20
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
22
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
26
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%