Back

One and Done: A safe, adaptable single-cycle SARS-CoV-2 vaccine platform blocks XBB.1.5 infection and transmission

Schoen, J.; Halwe, N. J.; Britzke, T.; Breithaupt, A.; Ulrich, L.; Kochmann, J.; Corleis, B.; Kipfer, E. T.; Klimkait, T.; Hoffmann, D.; Otte, F.; Beer, M.; Hauser, D.

2026-03-10 immunology
10.64898/2026.03.09.709481 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A next-generation SARS-CoV-2 vaccine must address the currently inadequate prevention of virus transmission, particularly against emerging variants of concern, a challenge that none of the licensed commercial vaccines fully meet. Effective control of respiratory pandemics necessitates vaccines that 1) can be rapidly adapted, 2) have high patient compliance with simple and non-invasive administration, and 3) block transmission in a virus challenge. We describe here the characterization of an updated single-cycle SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate (scVac), engineered as a replication-defective virus with targeted deletions of the E gene and ORF6 and ORF7a, along with a truncation of ORF3a. The candidate carries an Omicron XBB.1.5 Spike (scVacXBB), maintaining all essential antigenic properties. The vaccine demonstrated an excellent safety profile in K18-hACE2 transgenic mice, the most sensitive virulence model, with no clinical signs or adverse events observed. In the Syrian hamster model, potent systemic and mucosal immune responses were induced, along with a strong neutralizing antibody response. Notably, there was no virus transmission to co-housed naive animals, which outperforms a bivalent Omicron mRNA vaccine reference. Our results demonstrate that scVacXBB-induced immunity not only prevents disease but also effectively blocks transmission. Furthermore, the successful introduction of the XBB.1.5 Spike protein into the scVac platform demonstrates the pipelines ability to adapt quickly to any emerging variant. These findings highlight the potential of this single-cycle concept as a next-generation COVID-19 vaccine, offering robust protection with a strong safety profile.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
2
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.2%
3
npj Vaccines
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
6
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
7
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
8
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
10
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.1%
12
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
13
Cellular & Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
15
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
16
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
19
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
22
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
25
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%
29
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
30
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.6%