TYGFI and Stroke Risk in US Older Adults
Lou, Y.; Fang, J.; Li, S.; Mao, Y.; Song, D.; Guo, F.; Zuo, Y. c.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe triglyceride-glucose-frailty index (TYGFI) is an emerging marker of metabolic-geriatric risk; however, its association with stroke and the mediating role of body mass index (BMI) remain underexplored in large, representative populations. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 9,913 adults aged [≥]50 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2018. Stroke was defined based on self-reported diagnosis. TYGFI was calculated as a composite of the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index and the frailty index (FI). BMI was evaluated as a continuous mediator. We employed multivariable logistic regression, restricted cubic spline (RCS) models, threshold effect analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, subgroup analysis, and causal mediation analysis, adjusting for key sociodemographic and clinical confounders. ResultsElevated TYGFI was strongly associated with increased odds of stroke (fully adjusted odds ratio OR = 3.64, 95% confidence interval CI: 3.06-4.33, p < 0.001). RCS analysis revealed a significant nonlinear positive relationship (p-nonlinearity < 0.001), with an inflection point identified at TYGFI = 1.094. TYGFI was positively associated with BMI (fully adjusted {beta} = 4.09, 95% CI: 3.78-4.41, p < 0.001). Causal mediation analysis indicated that BMI exerted a significant negative indirect effect on the TYGFI-stroke association in the core model (average causal mediation effect ACME =-0.0051, 95% CI:-0.0082 to-0.0025, p < 0.001), mediating -18.28% of the total effect. However, this indirect effect became negligible after adjusting for the body roundness index (BRI) (ACME = 0.0000, 95% CI:-0.0001 to 0.0003, p = 0.670). Subgroup analyses demonstrated consistent risk elevation across all strata (all p for interaction > 0.05). The fully adjusted model yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.78-0.82). ConclusionHigher TYGFI is robustly associated with increased stroke risk among US adults aged [≥]50 years. While BMI acts as a significant negative mediator, this effect is abrogated upon adjustment for central adiposity (BRI). These findings support a metabolic-geriatric pathway linking metabolic dysregulation, body composition, and cerebrovascular risk, positioning TYGFI as a promising target for stroke risk stratification in middle-aged and older adults.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Circulating interleukin-6 levels and incident ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies 94%
- Interplay between Chronic Kidney disease, Hypertension, and Stroke: Insights from a Multivariable Mendelian Randomization Analysis 94%
- Diabetes mellitus, glycemic traits, and cerebrovascular disease: a Mendelian randomization study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations between cardiovascular risk factors, stroke severity, and post-stroke cognition: a moderated mediation analysis 95%
- Mendelian randomization of dyslipidemia on cognitive impairment among older Americans 93%
- Physician-confirmed and administrative definitions of stroke in UK Biobank reflect the same underlying genetic trait 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal associations of sustained low or high income and income variability with incident cardiovascular disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective population-based cohort study 94%
- Association between adiposity and cardiovascular outcomes: an umbrella review and meta-analysis 92%
- Development and validation of a risk prediction algorithm for high-risk populations combining genetic and conventional risk factors of cardiovascular disease 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.