Back

Measurement strategy alters inferred age-dependent accumulation and mortality risk of mosaic Y loss

Ware, A.; Weyrich, M.; Fatima, S.; Xu, T.; Radhakrishnan, S.; Kapfer, P.; Yang, X.; Schiethe, L.; Zanders, L.; Cremer, S.; Mas-Peiro, S.; Dimmeler, S.; Speer, T.; Zeiher, A.; Abplanalp, W.

2026-03-10 health informatics
10.64898/2026.03.09.26347951 medRxiv
Show abstract

Mosaic loss of Y chromosome (mLOY) is a widely used biomarker of biological aging, yet whether its inferred age-dependent accumulation and associated clinical risk are invariant to measurement strategy remains unclear. We compared intensity-based and phase-based quantification approaches in 223,251 men from the UK Biobank to determine how analytic definitions influence estimates of mLOY burden, risk thresholds and population prevalence. Phase-based quantification revealed a steeper and more stable age-dependent accumulation of mLOY and identified excess mortality risk at lower mosaic burdens than intensity-based metrics. These differences shifted the inferred onset of biological risk and expanded the proportion of individuals classified as affected from 5.3% to 19.2%. Conventional thresholding preferentially excluded low-burden mosaicism, compressing risk gradients and reducing statistical resolution for downstream associations. These findings show that analytic definitions materially alter inferred accumulation dynamics, risk thresholds and population prevalence of mosaic Y loss.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 13%
12.8%
2
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
4
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.9%
5
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.0%
8
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
10
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.4%
12
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
14
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
16
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.0%
18
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
21
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.7%
25
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
26
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
27
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
28
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.7%
29
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
30
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.5%