Back

Treatment escalation after clinically silent MRI lesions in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Daruwalla, C.; Kremler, C.; Patti, F.; Ozakbas, S.; Boz, C.; Lechner-Scott, J.; Surcinelli, A.; Foschi, M.; Khoury, S. J.; Butzkueven, H.; van der Walt, A.; Rous, Z.; Habek, M.; Meca-Lallana, J. E.; Valero Lopez, G.; Alroughani, R.; Blanco, Y.; Laureys, G.; Skibina, O.; Buzzard, K.; Gray, O.; McCombe, P.; Maimone, D.; Duquette, P.; Girard, M.; Prat, A.; Sanchez-Menoyo, J. L.; van Pesch, V.; Soysal, A.; Pia Amato, M.; Grand'Maison, F.; Wilton, J.; Van Wijmeersch, B.; Gerlach, O.; Lugaresi, A.; Tomassini, V.; De Luca, G.; Taylor, B.; Foong, Y. C.; John, N.; Cardenas-Robledo, S.; Hodgkinson, S.;

2026-03-10 neurology
10.64898/2026.03.09.26347918 medRxiv
Show abstract

Clinically silent MRI lesions occur frequently in people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) despite disease modifying therapy (DMT). Guidelines only recommend DMT escalation after multiple silent lesions, and adherence is variable. We explored outcomes and the effect of treatment escalation following single and multiple on-treatment silent lesions. This cohort study and emulated target trial used MSBase registry data from 99 clinics in 26 countries between 2007 and 2025. Clinically stable participants receiving any DMT for RRMS with silent lesions versus without silent lesions were compared. Among participants with silent lesions while taking platform or moderate-efficacy DMTs, outcomes following treatment escalation within 6 months versus no treatment escalation (unless a post-MRI clinical event occurred) were compared. The primary outcome was an MS relapse, and the secondary outcome was 6-month confirmed disability worsening. A total of 10,232 participants met inclusion criteria (71.7% female, mean age 41 [SD 11]). The 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 27.8% (95% CI 25.7%-29.9%) in participants with silent lesions versus 14.3% (95% CI 13.5%-15.2%) without (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.76 [95% CI 1.57-1.97]). The 2-year cumulative incidence of disability worsening was 13.8% (95% CI 12.2%-15.5%) in participants with silent lesions versus 11.4% (95% CI 10.7%-12.2%) without (aHR 1.38 [95% CI 1.18-1.62]). Rates of relapse and disability worsening were higher following single and multiple silent lesions versus no silent lesions. The emulated trial included 2,264 participants with [≥]1 silent lesion on platform or moderate efficacy DMTs, 286 of whom escalated DMT within 6 months following silent lesions. The 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse was lower following treatment escalation (16.8% [95% CI 12.4%-23.4%]) versus continuation (38.9% [95% CI 35.8%-42.1%]), aHR 0.34 (95% CI 0.23-0.47), with similar aHRs following single and multiple silent lesions. The 4-year cumulative incidence of disability worsening was similar following treatment escalation (16.0% [95% CI 10.8%-22.2%]) versus continuation (17.7% [95% CI 15.3%-20.1%]), aHR 0.89 (95% CI 0.56-1.33). People with RRMS with single or multiple on-treatment silent MRI lesions have higher subsequent risks of relapse and disability worsening than people without silent lesions. DMT escalation mitigates the relapse risk, though disability worsening continues at a similar rate over 4 years. Contrary to guidelines, DMT escalation should be considered after single or multiple silent lesions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.0%
2
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.8%
4
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
5
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
7
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
8
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
9
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
10
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
11
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
14
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
16
Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.4%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.4%
19
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
21
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
25
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
28
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%
29
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%