Back

Impact of Left Common Carotid Cannula Design on Flow Distribution and Cerebral Perfusion Pressure During Bilateral Selective Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion: An Experimental and Computational Study

Holmlund, P.; Servin, J.; Vikstrom, A.; Johannesdottir, M.; Zarrinkoob, L.; Hellstrom, J.; Appelblad, M.

2026-03-10 surgery
10.64898/2026.03.09.26347594 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn aortic arch surgery, bilateral selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (bSACP) maintains cerebral blood flow during circulatory arrest. bSACP is often delivered using a single pump with a Y-connector, dividing the flow. Current practice has veered towards perfusion of the left common carotid artery by cannula and the right subclavian artery or axillary artery by a vascular graft. Under this configuration, inflow distribution may be sensitive to left-sided cannula resistance, particularly in patients with limited collateral circulation, potentially reducing left-hemispheric pressure and flow despite bSACP. We investigated how cannula design influences perfusion pressure and arterial inflow distribution during bSACP. MethodsFour perfusion cannulas with different flow resistances were characterized using bench measurements (40-200 ml/min) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The CFD cannula models were then integrated into patient-specific CFD models of the cerebral circulation from three patients with varying collateral circulation/capacity. Both flow- and pressure-controlled pump strategies were simulated. ResultsBench measurements showed substantial variation in flow resistance between the cannulas, which was accurately reproduced by CFD. For the patient-specific analysis, cannula choice affected perfusion through roughly doubled pressure laterality and halved left-side inflow between the most extreme cannulas. Still, perfusion pressure was kept within recommended levels in two subjects but was low in one. Left-side arterial inflow varied between 70-150 ml/min. ConclusionsWe isolated the effects of cannula design on cerebral pressure and blood inflow distribution during bSACP, highlighting potential pitfalls in patients with limited collateral circulation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.8%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 13%
13.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 5%
9.5%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
6
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
7
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
8
Neurophotonics
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
9
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
10
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
11
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
12
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
13
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
14
Transfusion
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
15
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
17
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
18
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
26
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
27
Critical Care Explorations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%