Back

Impact of Left Common Carotid Cannula Design on Flow Distribution and Cerebral Perfusion Pressure During Bilateral Selective Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion: An Experimental and Computational Study

Holmlund, P.; Servin, J.; Vikstrom, A.; Johannesdottir, M.; Zarrinkoob, L.; Hellstrom, J.; Appelblad, M.

2026-03-10 surgery
10.64898/2026.03.09.26347594 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn aortic arch surgery, bilateral selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (bSACP) maintains cerebral blood flow during circulatory arrest. bSACP is often delivered using a single pump with a Y-connector, dividing the flow. Current practice has veered towards perfusion of the left common carotid artery by cannula and the right subclavian artery or axillary artery by a vascular graft. Under this configuration, inflow distribution may be sensitive to left-sided cannula resistance, particularly in patients with limited collateral circulation, potentially reducing left-hemispheric pressure and flow despite bSACP. We investigated how cannula design influences perfusion pressure and arterial inflow distribution during bSACP. MethodsFour perfusion cannulas with different flow resistances were characterized using bench measurements (40-200 ml/min) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The CFD cannula models were then integrated into patient-specific CFD models of the cerebral circulation from three patients with varying collateral circulation/capacity. Both flow- and pressure-controlled pump strategies were simulated. ResultsBench measurements showed substantial variation in flow resistance between the cannulas, which was accurately reproduced by CFD. For the patient-specific analysis, cannula choice affected perfusion through roughly doubled pressure laterality and halved left-side inflow between the most extreme cannulas. Still, perfusion pressure was kept within recommended levels in two subjects but was low in one. Left-side arterial inflow varied between 70-150 ml/min. ConclusionsWe isolated the effects of cannula design on cerebral pressure and blood inflow distribution during bSACP, highlighting potential pitfalls in patients with limited collateral circulation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.8%
2
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
8.6%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.6%
5
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
8
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
9
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
13
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
17
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Transfusion
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
20
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
21
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
30
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%