Smartphone video-based estimates of the knee extension moment during chair rise relate to MRI measures of muscle function

BackgroundPreserving muscle function is essential for maintaining independence during aging, but muscle force-generating capacity is not commonly measured clinically due to a lack of accessible, sensitive tools. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides gold-standard measures of muscle volume and microstructure, which reflect force-generating capacity, while dynamometry quantifies peak joint moments during voluntary contraction. Both modalities are time-consuming and costly, so clinical and large-scale studies often rely on low-fidelity measures such as the time to complete the five times sit-to-stand test (5xSTS). OpenCap, a tool for quantifying musculoskeletal dynamics from smartphone videos, may provide an accessible and more informative approach to assessing muscle function. We evaluated whether OpenCap-derived knee extension moments during chair rise relate to MRI-based measures of quadriceps muscle volume and microstructure, using dynamometry as a comparator. MethodsNineteen healthy adults of various ages (63.2% female, 57.8 {+/-} 15.4 y, 30-78 y) underwent quadriceps MRI, dynamometry, and 5xSTS time with concurrent OpenCap data collection. Using MRI, we computed quadriceps volume and radial diffusivity (a measure related to fiber size). We standardized these features and summed to create a composite MRI score, reflecting muscle quantity and quality. We estimated peak knee extension moment using OpenCap during chair rise and via both isometric and isokinetic dynamometry. We compared OpenCap kinematics (torso angle) and dynamics (knee moment), 5xSTS time, and dynamometry to MRI measures of muscle function using linear regression; false discovery rate was controlled using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. ResultsThe OpenCap-derived knee extension moment was associated with quadriceps muscle volume (r=0.63, p=0.014) and radial diffusivity (r=0.61, p=0.016). Peak knee extension moments measured by both isometric and isokinetic dynamometry were correlated with muscle volume (r=0.66-0.75, p=0.002-0.009), but not with radial diffusivity (r=0.04-0.52, p=0.054-0.91). Both OpenCap and isokinetic dynamometry showed their strongest associations with the composite MRI score (r=0.77, p=0.002 and r=0.73, p=0.002, respectively). 5xSTS time and a kinematic feature (torso angle) were not associated with any MRI-derived measures (r=-0.16-0.35, p=0.22-0.97). ConclusionsSmartphone video-based joint moments associate with muscle size and microstructure, unlike time or kinematic features. OpenCap offers a scalable assessment of muscle force-generating capacity that can be conducted rapidly without specialized equipment, enabling higher-fidelity assessments of muscle function in the clinic and in large-scale studies where imaging and dynamometry are impractical.