Back

Translation, adaption and validation of HIVAIDS stigma and discrimination scale for university students in China.

Wang, X.; Pan, Z.; Zhao, J.; Liu, R.; Wu, Z.; Chen, X.

2026-03-09 hiv aids
10.64898/2026.03.06.26347320 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundStigma - a procedures with label, stereotype, prejudice, status loss, and discrimination -has long played a role in the spread of HIV since the beginning of the epidemic. However, few researchers conducted on the HIV-related stigma and discrimination for general population in China. Consequently, we introduced translated and adapted the English version of HIV/AIDS Stigma and Discrimination Scale applied for undergraduates in China. ObjectiveThis study aimed to adapt the HIV/AIDS Public Stigma and Discrimination Scale (HPSDS) in China and to investigate its psychometric properties (e.g., reliability and validity). MethodsUsing translation, back-translation, quality evaluation, cross-cultural adaption and pre-assessment, a Chinese draft version of the HPSDS was obtained. From April 2022 to July 2022, the scale was distributed to179 universities and colleges and 2,333 college students filled out the translated and adapted questionnaires. Finally, we collected 1,604 valid questionnaires. The results were recruited to assess the psychometric characteristics of the CV-HPSDS. ResultThe CV-PHSDS consists of 3 dimensions and 14 items with Cronbachs alpha coefficient, McDonalds omega coefficient and test-retest reliability of the scale are 0.869, 0.883 and 0.857 respectively, manifesting good internal consistency and stability. To construct validity of adapted scale, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted with the cumulative variance contribution rate of 76.6% was obtained. For confirmatory factor analysis, the CFI, GFI, TLI, and IFI showed excellent fitness to the structure, with fitness indices of 0.972, 0.949, 0.965, and 0.972, respectively. Finally, a valid and reliable instrument to measure the HIV/AIDS stigma and discrimination level is obtained. ConclusionThe translated and adapted version of HPSDS shows to be a reliable and valid instrument for assessing stigma and discrimination level for undergraduates.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
35.8%
2
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.9%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
5
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
6
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
7
AIDS and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
8
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
9
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.2%
10
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
11
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
12
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.6%
14
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
16
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
17
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
21
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Access Microbiology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
26
Sexually Transmitted Infections
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%