Translation, adaption and validation of HIVAIDS stigma and discrimination scale for university students in China.
Wang, X.; Pan, Z.; Zhao, J.; Liu, R.; Wu, Z.; Chen, X.
Show abstract
BackgroundStigma - a procedures with label, stereotype, prejudice, status loss, and discrimination -has long played a role in the spread of HIV since the beginning of the epidemic. However, few researchers conducted on the HIV-related stigma and discrimination for general population in China. Consequently, we introduced translated and adapted the English version of HIV/AIDS Stigma and Discrimination Scale applied for undergraduates in China. ObjectiveThis study aimed to adapt the HIV/AIDS Public Stigma and Discrimination Scale (HPSDS) in China and to investigate its psychometric properties (e.g., reliability and validity). MethodsUsing translation, back-translation, quality evaluation, cross-cultural adaption and pre-assessment, a Chinese draft version of the HPSDS was obtained. From April 2022 to July 2022, the scale was distributed to179 universities and colleges and 2,333 college students filled out the translated and adapted questionnaires. Finally, we collected 1,604 valid questionnaires. The results were recruited to assess the psychometric characteristics of the CV-HPSDS. ResultThe CV-PHSDS consists of 3 dimensions and 14 items with Cronbachs alpha coefficient, McDonalds omega coefficient and test-retest reliability of the scale are 0.869, 0.883 and 0.857 respectively, manifesting good internal consistency and stability. To construct validity of adapted scale, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted with the cumulative variance contribution rate of 76.6% was obtained. For confirmatory factor analysis, the CFI, GFI, TLI, and IFI showed excellent fitness to the structure, with fitness indices of 0.972, 0.949, 0.965, and 0.972, respectively. Finally, a valid and reliable instrument to measure the HIV/AIDS stigma and discrimination level is obtained. ConclusionThe translated and adapted version of HPSDS shows to be a reliable and valid instrument for assessing stigma and discrimination level for undergraduates.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing and validation of a questionnaire for assessment of individual's perceived risk of four major non-communicable diseases in Myanmar 98%
- Arabic validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the 5C scale for assessment of COVID-19 vaccines psychological antecedents 97%
- Misinformation on covid-19 origin and its relationship with perception and knowledge about social distancing: A cross-sectional study 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acculturation stressors and academic adjustment among Nepalese students in South Korean higher education institutions 97%
- The experience of distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-country examination on the fear of COVID-19 and the sense of loneliness 95%
- Mental health challenges and the associated factors in HIV-positive women who have children living with HIV in Indonesia: A qualitative study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 on College Students' at One of the Most Diverse Campuses in the United States: A Factor Analysis of Survey Data 95%
- COVID-19 Vaccine hesitancy in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A mixed-methods study 94%
- Implementation of Unassisted and Community-Based HIV Self-Testing (HIVST) during the COVID-19 pandemic among Men-who-have-sex-with-Men (MSM) and Transgender Women (TGW): A Demonstration Study in Metro Manila, Philippines 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychosocial Factors of Stigma and Relationship to Healthcare Service among Adolescents Living With HIV/AIDS in Kano State, Nigeria 96%
- Self-learning on COVID-19 among medical students and their preparedness to participate in government's COVID-19 response in Bhutan: a cross-sectional study 95%
- Determinants of infant formula feeding in Debre Berhan city: A community-based cross-sectional study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health literacy profiles correlate with participation in primary health care among patients with chronic diseases: A latent profile analysis 95%
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among the general population during COVID-19 outbreak in Iran: A national cross-sectional survey 95%
- Health Belief, Planned Behavior, or Psychological Antecedents: What predicts COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy better among the Bangladeshi Adults? 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.