Back

Computational identification of cross-kingdom microRNA compatibility between Moringa oleifera miR156 and the human CDK4 transcript

Govindaraj, P. R.; AKAYE, M. P.

2026-03-09 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.03.05.709853 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains one of the most aggressive breast cancer subtypes and lacks durable targeted therapies. Dysregulation of cell-cycle control, particularly through CDK4/6 signaling, is a defining feature of TNBC biology (Garrido-Castro et al., 2019). Extracts of Moringa oleifera have repeatedly been shown to induce G1-phase arrest in breast cancer models, yet the molecular basis of this phenotype remains unclear (Al-Asmari et al., 2015) (Gaffar et al., 2019). Emerging work on cross-kingdom regulation has raised the possibility that plant-derived microRNAs may, under specific conditions, interact with mammalian transcripts (Zhang et al., 2012) (Chin et al., 2016). Sequence shuffling for the negative control was performed with set.seed(42) to ensure reproducibility. Additional visualisations (nucleotide alignment and thermodynamic analyses) were generated using Python 3 (matplotlib v3.7). Here, we performed a high-stringency computational screen of conserved Moringa microRNAs against 30 genes implicated in TNBC pathogenesis using local sequence alignment. We identify a predicted high-affinity interaction between mol-miR156 and the human CDK4 3' untranslated region (3'UTR), characterized by an uninterrupted 12-nucleotide complementary motif that exceeds canonical mammalian microRNA seed requirements. These findings support the hypothesis that conserved plant microRNAs may exhibit latent structural compatibility with oncogenic human transcripts. While physiological delivery and functional repression are not demonstrated here, this work establishes a molecular framework for future experimental investigation into cross-kingdom RNA interactions relevant to cancer cell-cycle regulation. Impact StatementA high-stringency computational screen identifies latent molecular compatibility between a conserved plant microRNA and the human CDK4 oncogene, establishing a testable framework for cross-kingdom RNA interference in triple-negative breast cancer.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.2%
3
RNA
169 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
4
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 14%
3.6%
5
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
7
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
8
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
10
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.1%
14
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
15
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.5%
17
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
RNA Biology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
23
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.8%
29
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%