Back

Barriers and facilitators to intracerebral haemorrhage platform trial recruitment: a survey of stroke clinicians

Boldbaatar, A.; Moullaali, T. J.; MacRaild, A.; Risbridger, S.; Hosking, A.; Richardson, C.; Clay, G. A.; Dennis, M.; Sprigg, N.; Barber, M.; Parry-Jones, A. R.; Weir, C. J.; Werring, D. J.; Salman, R. A.-S.; Samarasekera, N.

2026-03-06 neurology
10.64898/2026.03.05.26347732 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPlatform trials are an efficient trial design which enable testing of multiple interventions simultaneously. They could advance knowledge of treatments for intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). We aimed to investigate the views of clinicians involved in stroke research on recruitment to a future platform trial for ICH. MethodsBetween April and July 2025, we conducted a UK-wide online survey of clinicians actively involved in stroke research using convenience sampling through professional organisations. Participants considered factors related to the consent process and research environment and could provide optional free text responses about additional barriers or facilitators to recruitment. We used descriptive statistics for quantitative data and content analysis for qualitative data. ResultsAmong 73 respondents, 46 (63%) were female, 36 (50%) were stroke physicians, 24 (34%) nurses, 6 (8%) allied health professionals, and 7 (10%) were in other roles. 36 (49%) had >20 years clinical experience, 45 (61%) reported spending <10% of their role in research. 66 (91%) thought that a platform trial would be a good option for testing interventions for patients with stroke due to ICH. Across 11 modifiable factors, clinicians most frequently rated perceived importance of the research question as a facilitator of recruitment (94%), while clinician preference for specific treatments was most frequently rated as a barrier (48%). Two themes emerged from free text responses: study design and infrastructure. Regarding study design respondents perceived consent procedures (n=9), study materials (n=8), study procedures (n=8), eligibility assessment (n=6), the research question (n=3) and randomization (n=3) as important for a future platform trial. Regarding infrastructure, emergent factors were staffing (n=17), local research culture and capacity (n=9), research governance and delivery (n=6), and training (n=6). ConclusionThe overwhelming majority of respondents from the UK clinical stroke community supported a platform trial for ICH, although the influence of survey responder bias is unknown.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.6%
2
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.5%
4
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.2%
6
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
8
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
9
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
10
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
21
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
22
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
24
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 80%
0.5%