Barriers and facilitators to intracerebral haemorrhage platform trial recruitment: a survey of stroke clinicians
Boldbaatar, A.; Moullaali, T. J.; MacRaild, A.; Risbridger, S.; Hosking, A.; Richardson, C.; Clay, G. A.; Dennis, M.; Sprigg, N.; Barber, M.; Parry-Jones, A. R.; Weir, C. J.; Werring, D. J.; Salman, R. A.-S.; Samarasekera, N.
Show abstract
BackgroundPlatform trials are an efficient trial design which enable testing of multiple interventions simultaneously. They could advance knowledge of treatments for intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). We aimed to investigate the views of clinicians involved in stroke research on recruitment to a future platform trial for ICH. MethodsBetween April and July 2025, we conducted a UK-wide online survey of clinicians actively involved in stroke research using convenience sampling through professional organisations. Participants considered factors related to the consent process and research environment and could provide optional free text responses about additional barriers or facilitators to recruitment. We used descriptive statistics for quantitative data and content analysis for qualitative data. ResultsAmong 73 respondents, 46 (63%) were female, 36 (50%) were stroke physicians, 24 (34%) nurses, 6 (8%) allied health professionals, and 7 (10%) were in other roles. 36 (49%) had >20 years clinical experience, 45 (61%) reported spending <10% of their role in research. 66 (91%) thought that a platform trial would be a good option for testing interventions for patients with stroke due to ICH. Across 11 modifiable factors, clinicians most frequently rated perceived importance of the research question as a facilitator of recruitment (94%), while clinician preference for specific treatments was most frequently rated as a barrier (48%). Two themes emerged from free text responses: study design and infrastructure. Regarding study design respondents perceived consent procedures (n=9), study materials (n=8), study procedures (n=8), eligibility assessment (n=6), the research question (n=3) and randomization (n=3) as important for a future platform trial. Regarding infrastructure, emergent factors were staffing (n=17), local research culture and capacity (n=9), research governance and delivery (n=6), and training (n=6). ConclusionThe overwhelming majority of respondents from the UK clinical stroke community supported a platform trial for ICH, although the influence of survey responder bias is unknown.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of TeleStroke Consultations to Support the Care of Stroke Patients Presenting to Regional Emergency Departments in Western Australia: An Economic Evaluation Case Study Protocol 95%
- Measurement of quality of stroke care with national electronic health records: a cohort during and after the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Reporting of Retrospective Registration in Clinical Trial Publications 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- When two communication differences intersect: Comparing inpatient rehabilitation care and outcomes for people with post-stroke aphasia who do and do not require an interpreter 94%
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes after Reversal of Subtherapeutic Warfarin: Analysis of Data from GWTG-Stroke 93%
- Prospective Observational Cohort Study Of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase In Routine Clinical Practice 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Practitioner, patient and public views on the acceptability of Mobile Stroke Units in England and Wales: a mixed methods study 95%
- The whole day matters after stroke: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of a 'sit less, move more, sleep better program early after stroke 92%
- Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: Protocol For a Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the impact of a pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme on mortality and healthcare utilisation in patients with covid-19 assessed in Accident and Emergency departments in England: a retrospective matched cohort study 92%
- Population level impact of a pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme on mortality and healthcare utilisation in the people with covid-19 in England: a national analysis using a stepped wedge design 91%
- The association between major trauma centre care and outcomes of adult patients injured by low falls in England and Wales 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Text-message based assessment of 90-day modified Rankin Scale after Stroke 95%
- Influence of socioeconomic status on functional outcomes after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Tenecteplase 0.4 mg/kg in moderate and severe acute ischemic stroke: A pooled analysis of NOR-TEST & NOR-TEST 2A 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.