Predictive Value of Blood Tests in Postoperative Delirium for Abdominal Surgery Patients
Chorney, W.; Lisi, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundPostoperative delirium is a common complication in surgical patients, and is associated with a multitude of negative outcomes, including mortality, dementia, and increased healthcare costs. Therefore, a better understanding of what factors contribute to postoperative delirium, especially those that can be easily obtained, is important. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database. Adult patients undergoing procedures in abdominal surgery who did not have pre-existing delirium were included in the study. Overall, we included 8022 procedures across 7212 patients. For each admission, we extracted values obtained from common blood tests, the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity score, and patient demographic information. We used stepwise logistic regression to identify predictive factors of postoperative delirium in this cohort. ResultsThe model isolated factors well known to be associated with postoperative delirium, such as age, comorbidity (as represented by the Elixhauser comorbidity score), and Parkinsons disease. The model also selected variables that are less studied, such as minimum preoperative platelets and maximum preoperative sodium levels. We hypothesize that the former is associated with postoperative delirium as a surrogate marker for inflammation as an acute phase reactant, and the second due to it being a marker for cerebral edema and altered neurotransmission. ConclusionPreoperative blood tests contain valuable information that can be used alongside patient demographics and past medical history to better predict the risk of postoperative delirium.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the predictive value of frailty scores for critical care admission and hospital stay in elderly surgical patients: a comparison of the mFI-5 and CCI 96%
- Association between Intraoperative End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide and Postoperative Organ Dysfunction in Major Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study 94%
- Development of a Risk Prediction Model for Sepsis-Related Delirium Based on Multiple Machine Learning Approaches and an Online Calculator 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Point-of-care electroencephalography for prediction of postoperative delirium in older adults undergoing elective surgery: protocol for a prospective cohort study 94%
- A Novel Method for Handling Pre-Existing Conditions in Prediction Models for Covid-19 Death 90%
- Prediction of high-risk liver cancer patients from their mutation profile: Benchmarking of mutation calling techniques 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the Association and Predictability of Complex Medication Regimen Scores with Clinical Outcomes Among the Critically Ill 95%
- The association between dysnatraemia during hospitalisation and post COVID-19 mental fatigue 91%
- Effect of Virtually Led Value-Based Preoperative Assessment on Safety, Efficiency, and Patient and Professional Satisfaction 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Application of physiological network mapping in the prediction of survival in critically ill patients with acute liver failure 93%
- COMPARISON OF sPLA2-IIA PERFORMANCE WITH HIGH-SENSITIVE CRP, NEUTROPHIL PERCENTAGE, PCT AND LACTATE TO IDENTIFY BACTERIAL INFECTION: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY 93%
- Calprotectin as a sepsis diagnostic marker in critical care: a retrospective observational study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validating the RISE UP score for predicting prognosis in patients with COVID-19 in the emergency department, a retrospective study 93%
- Use of the first National Early Warning Score recorded within 24 hours of admission to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality in unplanned COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study 93%
- Hydrocortisone for the prevention of postoperative delirium in digestive surgery (HyPOD): Study protocol for a multicentre randomized, blind, placebo-controlled trial 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.