Back

Theory-based self-management interventions for stroke survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Meng, G.; Chen, Y.; Dai, M.; Tang, S.; Chen, Q.

2026-03-02 neurology
10.64898/2026.03.02.26346812 medRxiv
Show abstract

AbstractsO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSSelf-management is essential for stroke survivors to maintain a healthy lifestyle and reduce recurrence risk. Although theory-based self-management interventions are widely recommended, the theoretical frameworks underpinning them and their comparative effectiveness remain unclear. AimsTo systematically identify the theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) used in self-management interventions for stroke survivors, to explore how they guide interventions, and evaluate their effectiveness on self-management behaviors and self-efficacy. MethodsPubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ProQuest Health & Medical Collection and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to July 15, 2025. Randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental studies evaluating theory-based self-management interventions for stroke survivors were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (Cochrane RoB 2.0). Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. ResultsFrom 11,495 records, 32 studies with 3,212 participants were included. Sixteen distinct TMFs were identified; self-efficacy theory was most frequent (13/32), followed by social cognitive theory (6/32). All TMFs were middle-range theories. Meta-analysis showed TMFs-based interventions significantly improved self-management behaviors (SMD = 4.26, 95%CI: 0.20-8.31, I{superscript 2} = 98.2%) and self-efficacy (SMD = 0.60, 95%CI: 0.32-0.88, I{superscript 2} = 72.8%). However, the effect for behaviors is likely inflated due to extreme heterogeneity and theoretical diversity. Theory-specific analysis of self-efficacy theory (k = 8) confirmed significant effects on self-efficacy (SMD = 0.64, 95%CI: 0.21-1.08). ConclusionsThis review identified 16 distinct theoretical models; self-efficacy theory was most frequently applied, followed by social cognitive theory. Theory-based interventions significantly improved self-management behaviours and self-efficacy.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.6%
2
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.3%
4
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
5
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
6
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
7
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
9
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
19
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
23
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
26
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
28
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
29
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%