Back

iCLIP3: A streamlined, non-radioactive protocol for mapping protein-RNA interactions in cellular transcripts at single-nucleotide resolution

Despic, V.; Klostermann, M.; Orekhova, A.; Mesitov, M.; Busch, A.; Zarnack, K.; Koenig, J.; Mueller-McNicoll, M.

2026-03-03 genomics
10.64898/2026.03.01.708747 bioRxiv
Show abstract

UV-C crosslinking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP)-based methods are the gold standard for identifying direct RNA binding protein (RBP) interaction sites on cellular RNA in vivo. Here, we describe individual-nucleotide resolution CLIP version 3 (iCLIP3), an optimized protocol for generating transcriptome-wide maps of RBP-RNA interaction sites at single-nucleotide resolution from low-input material. iCLIP3 introduces several key improvements over previous iCLIP variants, including rapid and safe infrared-based visualization of RBP-RNA complexes, silica column-based RNA isolation, and the incorporation of TruSeq adapter sequences with unique dual indexing. These modifications streamline library preparation, facilitate multiplexing, and enable concurrent sequencing of iCLIP3 libraries alongside unrelated RNA-seq libraries. In addition, we provide a detailed bioinformatics workflow for identifying crosslinking events and defining RBP binding sites. The complete protocol can be performed within 4-5 days, offering a robust and efficient approach for high-resolution mapping of RBP-RNA interactions. HighlightsO_LI3' RNA labeling with pCp-IR750 enables rapid infrared visualization of RBP-RNA complexes C_LIO_LISilica column-based RNA isolation improves efficiency and reproducibility C_LIO_LITruSeq adapters with unique dual indexing enable flexible and scalable multiplexing C_LIO_LIiCLIP3 generates high-quality libraries from ultra-low amounts of cellular material C_LI

Published in STAR Protocols (predicted rank #5) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.