Back

Planning, Reminders and Micro-Incentives to Walk After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pilot Randomized Control Trial

Morris, T. P.; Tinney, E. M.; Toral, S.; O'Brien, A.; Gobena, E.; Hackman, L.; Nwakamma, M. C.; Perko, M. L.; Orchard, E.; Odom, H.; Chen, C.; Hwang, J.; Stillman, A. M.; Kramer, A. F.; Espanya-Irla, G.

2026-02-28 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.02.26.26347181 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSedentary behavior is highly prevalent following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and compounds existing risks for cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, and affective disorders. The cognitive and behavioral sequelae of TBI, including impaired decision-making, blunted reward processing, and cognitive fatigue, create particular barriers to adopting and maintaining an active lifestyle. Despite this, effective behavior change interventions targeting physical activity in community-dwelling TBI survivors remain scarce. Here, we evaluated the feasibility, compliance, and preliminary efficacy of a 12-week remotely delivered walking intervention combining planning, behavioral reminders, and monetary micro-incentives. MethodsFifty-six adults aged 40-80 years with a mild-to-moderate TBI diagnosed between 3 months and 15 years prior were randomized to either a planning, reminders, and micro-incentives intervention (n=23) or a health advice control condition (n=25). Participants wore a Fitbit Inspire 3 continuously throughout the study. Intervention participants completed weekly phone calls to plan five 30-minute walks for the following week, received daily text message or email reminders on planned walk days, and earned small monetary incentives upon walk completion. Control participants received weekly health education calls. Feasibility was assessed through recruitment, retention, and adverse event rates. Compliance was assessed via phone call completion rates and Fitbit wear time. Efficacy outcomes included weekly walk counts, walking duration, and step counts, modeled using Poisson generalized linear mixed models and linear mixed-effects models over 12 weeks. ResultsForty-eight participants completed the study (retention rate: 84.2%), with high phone call compliance in both groups (intervention: 98.4%; control: 98.1%). Intervention participants completed significantly more walks than controls from week 1 onward (aIRR = 5.33, 95% CI: 2.27-12.5, p < 0.001), with the group difference growing over time (interaction aIRR = 1.09 per week, 95% CI: 1.01-1.17, p = 0.029). Estimated marginal means indicated that intervention participants completed 5.5 times more walks than controls at week 1, increasing to 15.5 times more by week 12. The intervention group also walked significantly longer at week 1 (b = 62.14 min, 95% CI: 1.05-123.23, p = .046), with the advantage growing over time; by week 12, intervention participants walked 5.3 times longer than controls. Similarly, the intervention group accumulated significantly more steps during walks at week 1 (b = 4,779 steps, 95% CI: 45.50-9,513.00, p = .048), accumulating 3.1 times more steps than controls by week 12. ConclusionsA remotely delivered, multicomponent walking intervention targeting planning, behavioral reminders, and micro-incentives was feasible, well-tolerated, and produced meaningful increases in walking activity in community-dwelling adults with TBI. With high retention and compliance, and consistent effects on walk counts, duration, and steps across the intervention period, these findings provide compelling support for a larger, fully powered trial.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.7%
2
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.2%
5
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
6
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
8
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
9
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
12
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Aging
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
17
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
19
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
20
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.8%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
23
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
24
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%