Planning, Reminders and Micro-Incentives to Walk After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pilot Randomized Control Trial
Morris, T. P.; Tinney, E. M.; Toral, S.; O'Brien, A.; Gobena, E.; Hackman, L.; Nwakamma, M. C.; Perko, M. L.; Orchard, E.; Odom, H.; Chen, C.; Hwang, J.; Stillman, A. M.; Kramer, A. F.; Espanya-Irla, G.
Show abstract
BackgroundSedentary behavior is highly prevalent following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and compounds existing risks for cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, and affective disorders. The cognitive and behavioral sequelae of TBI, including impaired decision-making, blunted reward processing, and cognitive fatigue, create particular barriers to adopting and maintaining an active lifestyle. Despite this, effective behavior change interventions targeting physical activity in community-dwelling TBI survivors remain scarce. Here, we evaluated the feasibility, compliance, and preliminary efficacy of a 12-week remotely delivered walking intervention combining planning, behavioral reminders, and monetary micro-incentives. MethodsFifty-six adults aged 40-80 years with a mild-to-moderate TBI diagnosed between 3 months and 15 years prior were randomized to either a planning, reminders, and micro-incentives intervention (n=23) or a health advice control condition (n=25). Participants wore a Fitbit Inspire 3 continuously throughout the study. Intervention participants completed weekly phone calls to plan five 30-minute walks for the following week, received daily text message or email reminders on planned walk days, and earned small monetary incentives upon walk completion. Control participants received weekly health education calls. Feasibility was assessed through recruitment, retention, and adverse event rates. Compliance was assessed via phone call completion rates and Fitbit wear time. Efficacy outcomes included weekly walk counts, walking duration, and step counts, modeled using Poisson generalized linear mixed models and linear mixed-effects models over 12 weeks. ResultsForty-eight participants completed the study (retention rate: 84.2%), with high phone call compliance in both groups (intervention: 98.4%; control: 98.1%). Intervention participants completed significantly more walks than controls from week 1 onward (aIRR = 5.33, 95% CI: 2.27-12.5, p < 0.001), with the group difference growing over time (interaction aIRR = 1.09 per week, 95% CI: 1.01-1.17, p = 0.029). Estimated marginal means indicated that intervention participants completed 5.5 times more walks than controls at week 1, increasing to 15.5 times more by week 12. The intervention group also walked significantly longer at week 1 (b = 62.14 min, 95% CI: 1.05-123.23, p = .046), with the advantage growing over time; by week 12, intervention participants walked 5.3 times longer than controls. Similarly, the intervention group accumulated significantly more steps during walks at week 1 (b = 4,779 steps, 95% CI: 45.50-9,513.00, p = .048), accumulating 3.1 times more steps than controls by week 12. ConclusionsA remotely delivered, multicomponent walking intervention targeting planning, behavioral reminders, and micro-incentives was feasible, well-tolerated, and produced meaningful increases in walking activity in community-dwelling adults with TBI. With high retention and compliance, and consistent effects on walk counts, duration, and steps across the intervention period, these findings provide compelling support for a larger, fully powered trial.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.