A model-based evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of paediatric and elderly vaccination against pneumococcal infection in England
Keeling, M. J.; El Deeb, O. J.; Tran, P. B.; Petrou, S.; Hill, E. M.
Show abstract
Infection with pnuemococcus bacteria is generally mild but can be more severe in the young and elderly, causing invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Although paediatric pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) programmes and elderly pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV) programmes have reduced cases, we estimate that pneumococcal infection still leads to direct health care costs of around {pound}68M and approximately 16 thousand QALY losses in England per year. The public health situation is complicated by the large number of interacting serotypes, such that while serotype-specific vaccines reduced the target serotypes others arose to replace them. Here we develop a novel (relatively) low-dimensional model to capture the interaction of 26 common pneumococcal serotypes. The model is matched to English IPD data from 2000-2023 and to five carriage studies (conducted in 2001/02, 2008, 2012, 2015 and 2018). When combined with a health economic approach, this model allows us to calculate the willingness to pay for paediatric vaccination with PCV7 (introduced in England in 2006), PCV13 (introduced in England in 2010) and the future vaccination of both the young and elderly with PCV20, which offers protection against 20 serotypes. Due to rapid serotype replacement, we find that the introduction of PCV7 vaccination in 2006 was not cost effective - a result that could not have been anticipated at the time, but is supported by simple statistical fits to the IPD data. In contrast, switching to PCV13 in 2010 and switching to PCV20 in 2026 are both associated with a high willingness to pay for a single dose. Given pneumococcal disease has shifted over time to become predominantly in the older adult population, we find that switching from PPV23 to PCV20 vaccination in those aged 65 and introducing an additional PCV20 vaccine at age 75 are both cost effective for a sufficiently low vaccine price. The inference that underpins our model is unfortunately limited by the available data and the high-dimensional nature of multiple interacting serotypes. Future sampling of carriage from older adults would greatly improve our confidence, as would national estimates of CAP.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of routine COVID-19 adult vaccination programmes in England 97%
- Predicting immune protection against outcomes of infectious disease from population-level effectiveness data with application to COVID-19 97%
- Within-country age-based prioritisation, global allocation, and public health impact of a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2: a mathematical modelling analysis 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccines for reducing susceptibility to infection with the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2 96%
- Modelling the impact of hybrid immunity on future COVID-19 epidemic waves 94%
- The impact of introducing meningococcal C/ACWY booster vaccination among adolescents in Germany: a dynamic transmission modelling study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Epidemiological differences in the impact of COVID-19 vaccination in the United States and China 96%
- Predicting the epidemiological effects in the United Kingdom of moving from PCV13 to PCV15 in the routine pediatric 1+1 vaccination schedule 95%
- Within-host competition modulates pneumococcal antibiotic resistance in the pre-vaccination era 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.