Back

Three Distinct Trajectories of Red Blood Cell Distribution Width and Their Significant Association with Mortality in Sepsis Patients: A Group-Based Trajectory Modeling Study with Validation

Cai, L.; Hua, Y.; Lu, W.; Bing, h.; Gao, q.; Zhang, W.

2026-02-28 emergency medicine
10.64898/2026.02.25.26347114 medRxiv
Show abstract

The red cell distribution width (RDW) is a recognized prognostic marker in sepsis, yet its dynamic changes over time and their relationship with outcomes remain unexplored. This study aimed to identify distinct RDW trajectories during the early phase of sepsis and evaluate their association with mortality. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the MIMIC-IV database (n=3,813) as the derivation cohort and from the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (n=467) for external validation. Sepsis patients with at least seven RDW measurements within the first ten days of hospitalization were included. Group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) was employed to identify RDW trajectories. A three-trajectory model was selected based on model fit indices and clinical interpretability: Trajectory 1 (Slow-Decrease, 32.97%), Trajectory 2 (Slow-Increase, 43.30%), and Trajectory 3 (Fluctuating-Rapid Decrease, 23.73%). In the our study, Cox models adjusted for confounders revealed that, compared to Trajectory 1, Trajectory 3 was independently associated with significantly increased 30-day (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.17-1.84) and 90-day mortality (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.25-1.88). Conversely, Trajectory 2 was associated with the most favorable survival rates. Kaplan-Meier analysis consistently showed the highest mortality in the Trajectory 3 group. External validation confirmed the models robustness and the consistent prognostic value of the identified trajectories. We conclude that dynamic RDW trajectories, readily identifiable from routine clinical data, provide significant prognostic information beyond single-time-point measurements and can aid in the risk stratification of sepsis patients.

Published in Frontiers in Medicine (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.