Back

Three Distinct Trajectories of Red Blood Cell Distribution Width and Their Significant Association with Mortality in Sepsis Patients: A Group-Based Trajectory Modeling Study with Validation

Cai, L.; Hua, Y.; Lu, W.; Bing, h.; Gao, q.; Zhang, W.

2026-02-28 emergency medicine
10.64898/2026.02.25.26347114 medRxiv
Show abstract

The red cell distribution width (RDW) is a recognized prognostic marker in sepsis, yet its dynamic changes over time and their relationship with outcomes remain unexplored. This study aimed to identify distinct RDW trajectories during the early phase of sepsis and evaluate their association with mortality. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the MIMIC-IV database (n=3,813) as the derivation cohort and from the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University (n=467) for external validation. Sepsis patients with at least seven RDW measurements within the first ten days of hospitalization were included. Group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) was employed to identify RDW trajectories. A three-trajectory model was selected based on model fit indices and clinical interpretability: Trajectory 1 (Slow-Decrease, 32.97%), Trajectory 2 (Slow-Increase, 43.30%), and Trajectory 3 (Fluctuating-Rapid Decrease, 23.73%). In the our study, Cox models adjusted for confounders revealed that, compared to Trajectory 1, Trajectory 3 was independently associated with significantly increased 30-day (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.17-1.84) and 90-day mortality (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.25-1.88). Conversely, Trajectory 2 was associated with the most favorable survival rates. Kaplan-Meier analysis consistently showed the highest mortality in the Trajectory 3 group. External validation confirmed the models robustness and the consistent prognostic value of the identified trajectories. We conclude that dynamic RDW trajectories, readily identifiable from routine clinical data, provide significant prognostic information beyond single-time-point measurements and can aid in the risk stratification of sepsis patients.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
18.8%
2
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.5%
4
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.6%
6
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
7
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
8
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
10
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
11
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
12
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
13
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
16
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
17
Journal of Leukocyte Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
19
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
25
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
International Immunopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%