Back

Adhering to dietary guidelines does not yield flavanol intake levels associated with beneficial cardiovascular effects

Ottaviani, J. I.; Erdman, J. W.; Steinberg, F. M.; Manson, J. E.; Sesso, H. D.; Schroeter, H.; Kuhnle, G. G. C.

2026-02-26 nutrition
10.64898/2026.02.24.26346949 medRxiv
Show abstract

Outcomes from the COSMOS trial have reinforced the notion of flavanols as important plant-derived bioactives contributing to cardiovascular health. As discussions continue on whether specific dietary reference values for flavanols are warranted, it is possible that existing dietary guidelines emphasizing fruits and vegetables already yield sufficient flavanol intake levels. If this were the case, developing flavanol specific dietary reference values might be unnecessary. This study therefore aimed at assessing whether adherence to dietary recommendations for fruit and vegetable intake and overall diet quality achieves flavanol intake levels of 500 mg/day, the amount proven to mediate cardiovascular benefits in the COSMOS trial. Flavanol intake was objectively evaluated using two validated and complementary biomarkers, 5-(3{square},4{square}-dihydroxyphenyl)-{gamma}-valerolactone metabolites (gVLMB) and structurally related (-)-epicatechin metabolites (SREMB), in two geographically distinct studies: COSMOS (US; n=6,509) and EPIC-Norfolk (UK; n=24,154). The results showed that higher fruit and vegetable intakes and diet quality (assessed via the alternative healthy eating index-aHEI) were associated with increased flavanol intake in COSMOS. Nevertheless, fewer than 25% of participants meeting dietary guidelines achieved an estimated flavanol intake of [≥]500 mg/day. Similar findings were observed in EPIC-Norfolk as well as through flavanol intake simulations considering fruits and vegetables commonly consumed in the US diet. In conclusion, adherence to existing dietary guidelines does not yield flavanol intake levels comparable to those shown to provide cardiovascular benefits in COSMOS. Thus, specific dietary reference values for flavanols may still be necessary if aiming to increase the intake of these dietary compounds. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=101 SRC="FIGDIR/small/26346949v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (39K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2966f5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@269232org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@483edborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@116a957_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Food & Function
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.9%
2
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.7%
3
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
8
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
9
The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
10
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
13
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
15
Redox Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
16
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
17
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
Food Chemistry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
20
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
22
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
23
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%