Back

The Efficacy and Safety of Daily Low-Dose Iron Supplementation in Adults with Dietary Iron Deficiency: a Double-Blind, Randomized, Single-Center Study

Kravos, A.; Dolenc, B.; Fartek, N.; Locatelli, I.; Cebron Lipovec, N.; Rogelj Meljo, N.; Kos, M.; Dobovsek, T.; Panter, G.

2026-02-26 hematology
10.64898/2026.02.24.26346946 medRxiv
Show abstract

Iron deficiency (ID) is the most common nutritional deficiency worldwide, often caused by insufficient dietary intakes. Oral supplementation is one of the means to improve iron status. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of two low-dose iron supplements - >Your< Iron Forte Capsules (YIFC) and Ferrous Sulfate Capsules (FSC) - in individuals with dietary ID. One hundred and one participants (mean age 30.6 years; 98% women) with low iron stores (mean serum ferritin 16.1 {micro}g/L) were randomized to receive either YIFC or FSC once daily for 12 weeks. Changes in blood indices and iron-related parameters were assessed at four and 12 weeks of intervention relative to baseline. The primary outcome was the change in hemoglobin (Hb) after 12 weeks. Eighty-seven participants completed the study. Both supplements significantly increased Hb at 12 weeks (YIFC: mean 6.52 g/L, p<0.001; FSC: mean 5.71 g/L, p<0.001). Product-related adverse events (AEs) were few (17% of all AEs) and of mild to moderate intensity only. One participant receiving FSC withdrew due to a probable product-related AE. The frequencies of product-related AEs were similar between study arms, however, statistically significantly more AEs judged to be definitely related to the product occurred in in the FSC arm. While product-related AEs were confined to the gastrointestinal tract in the YIFC arm, they affected multiple organ systems in the FSC arm. Supplementation with either YIFC or FSC proved as an effective, well-tolerated, and safe strategy for improving iron status in non-anemic dietary iron deficiency. In terms of the AE profile, supplementation with YIFC may offer advantages over supplementation with FSC.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.