Back

Resource availability and dimensionality result in ecology-dependent selection in bacteriophage spatial expansions

Alam, H.; Fusco, D.

2026-02-24 ecology
10.64898/2026.02.23.707387 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In microbial populations, fitness, which is essential to understand and predict evolution, is often defined and measured as the net growth rate of a population in isolation. Applying the same definition to viruses is challenging, both because viral replication involves a host infection process, which is determined by several parameters that are context-dependent, and because viruses compete heavily for resources (susceptible cells). These challenges are particularly exacerbated in spatial range expansions, where multiplicity of infection is often high and resource availability varies in time and space. To assess different fitness definitions and their generalizability, we investigate a model of coupled partial differential equations for phage plaque expansion in one and two dimensions. We find that two commonly used metrics for phage fitness in plaque expansions, i.e., steady state phage densities and front expansion speed in isolation, are unable to reliably predict the winner in one- and two-dimensional direct competitions. More generally, we find that optimal phage traits depend on the dimensionality of the system and the make-up of the phage population, leading to unexpected behaviours, e.g., rock-paper-scissor dynamics and, in high dimensions, enhanced phage density due to the nearby presence of a competitor. We show that the phenomenon stems from the interplay between resource consumption and replication and thus may apply more broadly to any population competing for shared resources.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
13.8%
2
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
3
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.1%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.9%
5
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.1%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.4%
9
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.4%
10
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.4%
11
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
13
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
14
Theoretical Ecology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
17
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
20
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.6%
21
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
22
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
23
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
25
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
27
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
28
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%