Interventions to manage intolerance among patients prescribed statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Rakhshanda, S.; Jonnagaddala, J.; Liaw, S.-T.; Rhee, J.; Rye, K.-A.
Show abstract
The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify the interventions used to manage intolerance in patients receiving statins for primary prevention of CVD and to determine the effectiveness of these interventions. This study was conducted according to the PRISMA checklist. The electronic databases MEDLINE (PubMed), SCOPUS, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched for studies published until June 2025. Based on the NLA definition of statin intolerance, the outcomes were split into adverse effects caused by statins and statin discontinuation. In total, 1,238 studies were identified and screened. Nine studies were eligible for systematic review, and six studies were eligible for meta-analysis. The identified intervention strategies were adjuvant therapy, statin titration, replacing statins with other lipid-lowering agents and switching to different statin. The meta-analysis showed that the pooled risk ratio (RR) relative to control was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.86-1.08) in randomized controlled trials and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.63-1.42) in overall, with point estimates in favour of intervention arms. Moderate to substantial heterogeneity was observed, with I2 between 27% to 57%. Due to the smaller number of studies, no clear conclusions can be drawn regarding how the implemented interventions may affect statin discontinuation. This study showed no strong evidence that the implemented interventions reduced statin intolerance. PROSPERO registration numberCRD42024587573 HighlightsThis study found that the intervention strategies used to manage intolerance in patients receiving statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases were adjuvant therapy, statin titration, replacing statins with other lipid-lowering agents and switching to different statin. O_LIThis study showed no strong evidence that the implemented interventions reduced statin intolerance C_LIO_LIDue to the smaller number of studies, no clear conclusions can be drawn regarding how the implemented interventions may affect statin discontinuation C_LI
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multicenter preclinical studies as an innovative method to enhance translation: a systematic review of published studies 92%
- The effect of calcium supplementation in people under 35 years old: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 91%
- The Proportion of Randomized Controlled Trials That Inform Clinical Practice: A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Trials Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of statin withdrawal on perceived and objective muscle function 94%
- The protective association between statins use and adverse outcomes among COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infection triggers for acute myocardial infarction and stroke: systematic review protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential impact of Covid-19 on incidence of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases in acute, post-acute and long Covid-19: population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom 91%
- Comparative efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of confounder-adjusted 20212 hospitalized patients 90%
- Accuracy and clinical effectiveness of risk prediction tools for pressure injury occurrence: An umbrella review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Age at menopause and risk of ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
- Effect of an intensive lifestyle intervention on the structural and functional substrate for atrial fibrillation in people with metabolic syndrome 90%
- Severe biventricular cardiomyopathy in both current and former long-term users of anabolic-androgenic steroids. 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lipid-Modulating Agents for Prevention or Treatment of COVID-19 in Randomized Trials 95%
- Comparative Effectiveness of Second-line Antihyperglycemic Agents for Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Large-scale, Multinational, Federated Analysis of the LEGEND-T2DM Study 92%
- Antithrombotic Therapy in COVID-19: Systematic Summary of Ongoing or Completed Randomized Trials 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.