Back

Hematological and genetic basis of clinical heterogeneity of HemoglobinE/β-thalassemia

Noor, F. A.; Hossain, M.; Sarker, S. K.; Arafath, K.; Ety, S. S.; Maisha, J. A.; Mahmud-Un-Nabi, M. A.; Bhuyan, G. S.; Sultana, N.; Hossain, A. K. M. E.; Khan, W. A. K.; Shekhor, H. U.; Qadri, F.; Mannoor, K.

2026-02-23 genetics
10.64898/2026.02.22.707245 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Patients with HbE/{beta}-thalassemia inheriting the same {beta}-globin mutations display varied clinical manifestations, the mechanism of which is only partially known. The study aimed to decipher the heterogenous basis of HbE/{beta}-thalassemia patients in more details by focusing on both hematological and genetic modifiers influencing the disease severity, which included-(i) HbF and HbE levels using Hb electrophoresis, (ii) {beta}-thalassemia mutations, (iii) anti3.7triplication using Gap-PCR, (iv) individual and cumulative effects of HbF-inducing SNPs in 4 major modifier genes, namely HBG2, BCL11A, HBSB1L_MYB intergenic-region, and HBBP1 which were genotyped using DNA sequencing and Real-time PCR-HRM methods. Accordingly, 130 diagnosed Bangladeshi patients with HbE/{beta}-thalassemia were enrolled and categorized as mild, moderate, and severe as per Mahidol scoring system. c.79G>A+IVS1_5G>C was the most predominant (73.8% of total) mutation pair across all the 3 severity groups, indicating secondary modifiers might influence the severity. Our study found both HbF and HbE protective to HbE/{beta}-thalassemia, as both were inversely related to the severity score (HbF: p<0.0001/r=-0.55; HbE: p<0.0001/r=-0.56). Four SNPs-XmnI-G{gamma}, rs2071348 (HBBP1), rs489544 and rs28384513 (HBS1L_MYB) showed significant association with the elevated HbF levels (p=0.005, 0.0001, 0.0001, 0.004 respectively). The multivariate analysis showed that the risk genotypes with single or combination of 2, 3,and 4 SNPs showed gradually increased risk [Odd Ratio (95%CI)= 2.51, 5.47, 19.5, 39.0, respectively] of less severe phenotype, suggesting that these linked SNP variants had a cumulative effect on both HbF level and clinical severity score. However, low HbE level and copresence of anti3.7triplication were found to nullify the ameliorating effect of multiple SNPs.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.5%
3
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
5
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
6
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.8%
8
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
9
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
10
Bioscience Reports
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
11
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
12
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
13
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.8%
15
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
16
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
17
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Molecular Genetics and Genomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
23
Annals of Translational Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
25
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
26
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
28
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.5%
29
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
30
BioTechniques
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%