Back

Aging amplifies the influence of spatial contextual information on visual scene processing

Naveilhan, C.; Zory, R.; Ramanoel, S.

2026-02-20 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.20.706940 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Older adults rely increasingly on prior knowledge to make sense of their deteriorating representation of the visual world, but how this shapes scene perception and spatial reorientation remains unclear. To address this issue, 28 young and 25 older adults viewed artificially generated rooms either before or after learning the position of a goal hidden in an adjacent room. We manipulated both the number and the eccentricity of navigational affordances (i.e., open doors) to investigate the interaction between bottom-up scene features and top-down spatial knowledge. Consistent with previous findings, younger adults showed decreased performance as the number of open doors increased, but only after learning the goals position, indicating a top-down interaction with the automatic processing of affordances. Door eccentricity did not affect this interaction, suggesting our findings were not due to a distractor effect. In older adults, this interaction between prior spatial information and navigational affordances was markedly amplified: reaction times increased at twice the rate observed in younger adults. These findings show that prior spatial knowledge interacts with the automatic extraction of navigational affordances, and that this influence is markedly amplified with age. While prior knowledge helps stabilize perception when sensory processing becomes less reliable, it can also increase the processing time for complex scenes, particularly when multiple action possibilities are present. By revealing how aging shifts the balance between top-down and bottom-up mechanisms, these results refine models of age-related spatial navigation decline and highlight a trade-off whereby increased reliance on prior knowledge supports perception but can also slow interaction with complex environments.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.3%
2
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.8%
3
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.1%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.6%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.1%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.1%
7
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Communications Psychology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.5%
11
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
12
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
13
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.4%
15
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.0%
16
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
18
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
20
Hippocampus
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
22
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
25
Psychological Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
26
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
28
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%
29
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%