Back

Optimization of an automated system (ZEG) for rapid cellular extraction from live zebrafish

Tazin, N.; Lambert, C. J.; Samuel, R.; Nepal, S.; Gale, B.

2026-02-20 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.02.19.706735 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Collecting cells from zebrafish embryos for genotyping is critical to rapid research with these model organisms. The standard collection process is manual, labor-intensive, time-consuming, and requires a skilled person to perform it. To overcome this challenge, researchers are exploring the development of automated genotyping tools for live animals, which would significantly enhance the efficiency and accuracy of genetic screening in zebrafish and other species. The focus of this research was to optimize the Zebrafish Embryo Genotyper (ZEG), an automated system used for the rapid extraction of cellular material from zebrafish embryos. This system rapidly vibrates a roughened chip containing a zebrafish embryo to collect genetic material safely and efficiently. The aim was to improve the efficiency of DNA collection from the chips used with the ZEG by identifying the key factors that contribute to the process. First, the chips were modified to resolve issues associated with loss of sample volume from the chip wells due to evaporation during processing. Second, we experimented with three critical parameters - sample volume in the wells, the vibrational frequency of the system, and the operation time - on the quantity of DNA collected. The performance was evaluated by measuring embryo survival and quantifying the DNA collected. The sensitivity (previously 90%) of the DNA collection and embryo survival (previously 95%) of the were both found to be greater than 95% after optimization. The optimized design parameters (15 {micro}L solution volume, 2.4 V, and a 5-minute run with 5 s alternating on/off) provided a >50% increase in DNA collection compared to the previous designs and parameters. The proposed chip design and operation do not appear to cause any apparent adverse effects on the development or survival of the embryos.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 3%
29.8%
2
HardwareX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.9%
4
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.2%
6
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
7
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
8
SLAS Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
9
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
10
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
11
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
12
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
13
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
17
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
BMC Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
22
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
BMC Biotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
24
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%